Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects

被引:23
作者
Damen, Lianne [1 ]
van Agt, Frans [1 ]
de Boo, Theo [1 ]
Huysmans, Frans [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Eth Comm, Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek, POB 9101,Internal Code 578, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
RESEARCH ETHICS; PUBLICATION; COMMITTEE;
D O I
10.1136/medethics-2011-100020
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Medical research involving human subjects can be risky and burdensome. Therefore, such research must be reviewed and approved by a Research Ethics Committee (REC). To guarantee the safety of the subjects, it is very important that these studies be conducted in accordance with the approved protocol. An important issue in this respect is whether studies include the requisite number of subjects based on the research question. The research question is unlikely to be answered reliably if the requisite number of subjects is not met. In such cases, subjects are exposed to unnecessary risks and burdens. In this descriptive study, the authors evaluated how frequently studies are completed with the required number of subjects. Moreover, the authors identified the characteristics of research that does and does not include the required number of subjects. The results of this study show that a considerable proportion of studies ((41) under bar /107) were terminated although they failed to recruit a sufficient number of subjects. Furthermore, the authors found that investigator-initiated studies have significantly (p = 0.028) more problems in recruiting the requisite number of subjects than studies initiated by pharmaceutical companies. Potential solutions are discussed to reduce the number of studies that do not include a sufficient number of subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 416
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, BELM REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GUID GOOD CLIN PRACT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Ethics and regulation of clinical research
[4]   Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical [J].
Antes, G ;
Chalmers, I .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) :978-979
[5]   Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Glasziou, Paul .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9683) :86-89
[6]   Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols [J].
Chan, An-Wen ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Jorgensen, Karsten J. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 :1404-1407
[7]   Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias [J].
Dwan, Kerry ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Arnaiz, Juan A. ;
Bloom, Jill ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
Cronin, Eugenia ;
Decullier, Evelyne ;
Easterbrook, Philippa J. ;
Von Elm, Erik ;
Gamble, Carrol ;
Ghersi, Davina ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Simes, John ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08)
[8]   Research ethics committees and paternalism [J].
Edwards, SJL ;
Kirchin, S ;
Huxtable, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2004, 30 (01) :88-91
[9]   What makes clinical research ethical? [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wendler, D ;
Grady, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20) :2701-2711
[10]   What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics [J].
Garrard, E ;
Dawson, A .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (07) :419-423