Cooperative Learning Instructional Methods for CS1: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

被引:36
作者
Beck, Leland [1 ]
Chizhik, Alexander [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Sch Teacher Educ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
来源
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTING EDUCATION | 2013年 / 13卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Experimentation; Human Factors; Measurement; Cooperative learning; CS1; Classroom management; pedagogy; group formation; CONFLICT; STUDENTS; BEHAVIOR; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1145/2492686
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Cooperative learning is a well-known instructional technique that has been applied with a wide variety of subject matter and a broad spectrum of populations. This article briefly reviews the principles of cooperative learning, and describes how these principles were incorporated into a comprehensive set of cooperative learning activities for a CS1 course. In each activity, specific roles are assigned to group members in order to highlight important concepts and to enhance the overall functioning of the group. The group processing is followed by a whole-class debriefing led by the instructor, which works in tandem with the group activity to help students improve their understanding of the material. The effectiveness of these cooperative learning activities was assessed in a series of educational research studies which spanned three academic years and included two different instructors. The results of these studies show statistically significant benefits from the cooperative learning approach, both overall and for a broad range of subgroups of students. The article concludes with suggestions for faculty members who may want to use these cooperative learning activities in the classroom, or to develop their own activities along similar lines.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Lower-Status Participation and Influence:Task Structure Matters [J].
Alexander, Michele G. ;
Chizhik, Alexander W. ;
Chizhik, Estella W. ;
Goodman, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2009, 65 (02) :365-381
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TALKING LEAVING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Pair Programming Illuminated
[5]  
[Anonymous], J CHEM ED
[6]   ON THE COGNITIVE BENEFITS OF TEACHING [J].
BARGH, JA ;
SCHUL, Y .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 72 (05) :593-604
[7]  
Beck K., 2000, Extreme Programming Ex-plained: Embrace Change
[8]  
Beck L. L., 2005, SIGCSE Bulletin, V37, P470, DOI 10.1145/1047124.1047495
[9]  
Beck LL, 2008, SIGCSE'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, P205, DOI 10.1145/1352322.1352208
[10]  
Braught G, 2008, SIGCSE'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, P200, DOI 10.1145/1352322.1352207