Association of Federal Mental Health Parity Legislation With Health Care Use and Spending Among High Utilizers of Services

被引:4
作者
Haffajee, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Mello, Michelle M. [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Fang [4 ,5 ]
Busch, Alisa B. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [8 ]
Wharam, J. Frank [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
[6] McLean Hosp, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02178 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
mental health; quasi-experimental design; health law; utilization; costs; EQUITY ACT EVALUATION; INSURANCE PARITY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; IMPACT; BENEFITS; STILL;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000001076
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Decades-long efforts to require parity between behavioral and physical health insurance coverage culminated in the comprehensive federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. Objectives: To determine the association between federal parity and changes in mental health care utilization and spending, particularly among high utilizers. Research Design: Difference-in-differences analyses compared changes before and after exposure to federal parity versus a comparison group. Subjects: Commercially insured enrollees aged 18-64 with a mental health disorder drawn from 24 states where self-insured employers were newly subject to federal parity in 2010 (exposure group), but small employers were exempt before-and-after parity (comparison group). A total of 11,226 exposure group members were propensity score matched (1: 1) to comparison group members, all of whom were continuously enrolled from 1 year prepolicy to 1-2 years postpolicy. Measures: Mental health outpatient visits, out-of-pocket spending for these visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Results: Relative to comparison group members, mean out-of-pocket spending per outpatient mental health visit declined among exposure enrollees by $0.74 (1.40, 0.07) and $2.03 (3.17, 0.89) in years 1 and 2 after the policy, respectively. Corresponding annual mental health visits increased by 0.31 (0.12, 0.51) and 0.59 (0.37, 0.81) per enrollee. Difference-in-difference changes were larger for the highest baseline quartile mental health care utilizers [year 2: 0.76 visits per enrollee (0.14, 1.38); relative increase 10.07%] and spenders [year 2: $-2.28 (-3.76, -0.79); relative reduction 5.91%]. There were no significant difference-in-differences changes in emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Conclusions: In 24 states, commercially insured high utilizers of mental health services experienced modest increases in outpatient mental health visits 2 years postparity.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 255
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASPE ISSUE BRIEF AFF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Census 2000 Summary File 1 Technical Documentation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FED REGISTER, V75, P5410
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HLTH SERV RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1852007 SAS GLOB FOR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J HOPK ACG CAS MIX S
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FED REG
[8]   The effects of state mental health parity legislation on perceived quality of insurance coverage, perceived access to care, and use of mental health specialty care [J].
Bao, YH ;
Sturm, R .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 39 (05) :1361-1377
[9]   The costs of mental health parity: Still an impediment? [J].
Barry, CL ;
Frank, RG ;
McGuire, TG .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (03) :623-634
[10]   Marketwatch - Design of mental health benefits: Still unequal after all these years [J].
Barry, CL ;
Gabel, JR ;
Frank, RG ;
Hawkins, S ;
Whitmore, HH ;
Pickreign, JD .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (05) :127-137