National variation in preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis

被引:28
作者
Arous, Edward J. [1 ]
Simons, Jessica P. [1 ]
Flahive, Julie M. [1 ]
Beck, Adam W. [2 ]
Stone, David H. [3 ]
Hoel, Andrew W. [4 ]
Messina, Louis M. [1 ]
Schanzer, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Worcester, MA USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
VASCULAR-SURGERY; ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS GUIDELINE; ENDARTERECTOMY; ANGIOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; DISEASE; PREVENTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.438
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is among the most common procedures performed in the United States. However, consensus is lacking regarding optimal preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and ultimately, the threshold for surgery. We sought to characterize national variation in preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery for asymptomatic CEA. Methods: The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify all CEA procedures performed for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2003 and 2014. VQI currently captures 100% of CEA procedures performed at >300 centers by > 2000 physicians nationwide. Three analyses were performed to quantify the variation in (1) preoperative imaging, (2) carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and (3) threshold for surgery. Results: Of 35,695 CEA procedures in 33,488 patients, the study cohort was limited to 19,610 CEA procedures (55%) performed for asymptomatic disease. The preoperative imaging modality used before CEA varied widely, with 57% of patients receiving a single preoperative imaging study (duplex ultrasound imaging, 46%; computed tomography angiography, 7.5%; magnetic resonance angiography, 2.0%; cerebral angiography, 1.3%) and 43% of patients receiving multiple preoperative imaging studies. Of the 16,452 asymptomatic patients (89%) who underwent preoperative duplex ultrasound imaging, there was significant variability between centers in the degree of stenosis (50%-69%, 70%-79%, 80%-99%) designated for a given peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, and internal carotid artery-to-common carotid artery ratio. Although 68% of CEA procedures in asymptomatic patients were performed for an 80% to 99% stenosis, 26% were performed for a 70% to 79% stenosis, and 4.1% were performed for a 50% to 69% stenosis. At the surgeon level, the range in the percentage of CEA procedures performed for a <80% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is from 0% to 100%. Similarly, at the center level, institutions range in the percentage of CEA procedures performed for a < 80% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis from 0% to 100%. Conclusions: Despite CEA being an extremely common procedure, there is widespread variation in the three primary determinants-preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery-of whether CEA is performed for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Standardizing the approach to care for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis will mitigate the significant downstream effects of this variation on health care costs.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 944
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] Grant Edward G, 2003, Ultrasound Q, V19, P190, DOI 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005
  • [12] Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery
    Hobson, Robert W.
    Mackey, Williarn C.
    Ascher, Enrico
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Calligaro, Keith D.
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Eskandari, Mark K.
    Massop, Douglas W.
    Bush, Ruth L.
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Perler, Bruce A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (02) : 480 - 486
  • [13] Setting high-impact clinical research priorities for the Society for Vascular Surgery
    Kraiss, Larry W.
    Conte, Michael S.
    Geary, Randolph L.
    Kibbe, Melina
    Ozaki, C. Keith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (02) : 493 - 500
  • [14] Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: Is duplex ultrasonography sufficient
    Muto, PM
    Welch, HJ
    Mackey, WC
    ODonnell, TF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [15] Muto PM, 1996, J VASC SURG, V24, P22
  • [16] Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): Rationale for a Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Carotid Endarterectomy with Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
    Rudarakanchana, N.
    Dialynas, M.
    Halliday, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 38 (02) : 239 - 242
  • [17] SAS INSTITUTE INC, 2011, SAS STAT SOFTW COMP
  • [18] TAYLOR DW, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V325, P445
  • [19] ENDARTERECTOMY FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS
    WALKER, MD
    MARLER, JR
    GOLDSTEIN, M
    GRADY, PA
    TOOLE, JF
    BAKER, WH
    CASTALDO, JE
    CHAMBLESS, LE
    MOORE, WS
    ROBERTSON, JT
    YOUNG, B
    HOWARD, VJ
    PURVIS, S
    VERNON, DD
    NEEDHAM, K
    BECK, P
    DOZIER, M
    LEFKOWITZ, DS
    HOWARD, G
    CROUSE, JR
    HERRINGTON, DM
    FURBERG, CD
    ESSICK, K
    HICKS, RM
    NELSON, JJ
    BALL, W
    BLAND, E
    CONDON, S
    ELLIOTT, T
    GRIZZLE, JE
    HAYES, D
    HENLEY, S
    JOHNSON, J
    LOCKLEAR, J
    MISCH, MS
    PATON, CC
    SCHWARTZ, S
    WALKER, C
    WILLIAMS, OD
    EASTON, JD
    GOLDSTONE, J
    HALLENBECK, JM
    HOFF, JT
    KARP, HR
    KRONMAL, RA
    BROTT, TG
    TOMSICK, TA
    BRODERICK, J
    SAUERBECK, L
    BLUM, C
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (18): : 1421 - 1428
  • [20] Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting for stroke prevention: what we have and will learn from Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial
    Weaver, Fred A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 208 (01) : 124 - 129