RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF SPRING OPERATED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE

被引:0
作者
Bao, Shiyi [1 ]
Li, Zhibin [1 ]
Luo, Lijia [1 ]
Gao, Zengliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Inst Proc Equipment & Control, Hangzhou 310032, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2013, VOL 1A: CODES AND STANDARDS | 2014年
关键词
PETRI NETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Pressure relief valve (PRV) is an important automatic over-pressure protection system in the process industry. Because of the operating characteristics, the performance of PRV is supposed to be proved by the proof test. However, it's difficult to determine the proof test intervals and the availability of the PRY between two proof tests. Based on stochastic Petri nets (SPN), the reliability modeling and analysis procedure of spring operated full lift pressure relief valve which is the most widely used PRY is depicted in this paper. Firstly, the FMECA method is used to analyze the causes and effects of the typical six failure modes of the PRY, such as vibration, leakage, frequency hopping, unable to open, open before the settings and the low back seat pressure. Second, the corresponding fault tree (FT) models of the PRY are built through the multi-component failure analysis. Third, the SPN models of the PRY are established by employing the logical relations in the FT models. Based on the collected failure data of the PRVs, the steady state and transient reliability index are calculated by Monte Carlo simulation based on the SPN software SPN@. Last, the idea about PRY reliability data collection in domestic process industries is proposed. The result of the reliability analysis can provide the basis for determination the proof test intervals of the PRY, and the proposed procedure also bears significance in its application in the reliability analysis of general system in process industry.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] MUPPALA JK, 1994, COMMUNICATIONS RELIA
  • [12] NPRD, 1991, NON PARTS REL DAT
  • [13] Pham, 2005, INT J PERFORMABILITY, V1, P145, DOI DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100012
  • [14] Rausand M., 2004, SYSTEM RELIABILITY T
  • [15] Comparing safety analysis techniques
    Rouvroye, JL
    van den Bliek, EG
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 75 (03) : 289 - 294
  • [16] Modeling of system reliability Petri nets with aging tokens
    Volovoi, V
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 84 (02) : 149 - 161
  • [17] Volovoi V, 2006, P REL MAINT S, P75