Assessing daylight luminance values and daylight glare probability in scale models

被引:20
作者
Bodart, M. [1 ]
Cauwerts, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Fac Architecture Architectural Engn Urbanism LOCI, Architecture & Climat, Pl Levant 1 5-05-04, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
关键词
Daylighting; Visual comfort; Luminance; Scale models;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.033
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a research about the possibility to use a scale model of a room to assess the luminances in the visual field of the room's user, and consequently its risk of glare. Measurements of luminance values by the HDR technique were done simultaneously in a room and its 1/6 scale model, with identical measurement material. The room was lit by a lateral window either unprotected from direct sun radiation, or fitted with a white or black screen. Measurements show that luminance values obtained in the-scale model are overestimated and that the relative differences between values in the scale model and in the mock-up vary between 10 and 50% for the situation without shading device, between 45 and 80% for the window equipped with the white screen and between 0 and 45% with the black screen. Yet, the evolution of luminances is very similar for both rooms, and a high level of correlation is observed between glare index DGP values calculated on these respective luminance values, despite a very slight over-evaluation of the DGP in the scale model. In concliision, for the situation tested, the DGP can be evaluated using a 1:6 scale model, under the condition of very accurately respecting the geometry and photometric data of the studied room walls. It is also very important to position the scale model in a way to obtain a view on the outside as similar as possible to the one obtained from the studied room.(C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 219
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Photometry and colorimetry characterisation of materials in daylighting evaluation tools [J].
Bodart, M. ;
de Penaranda, R. ;
Deneyer, A. ;
Flamant, G. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 43 (12) :2046-2058
[2]  
Bodart Magali., 2007, Architectural Science Review, V50, P31, DOI DOI 10.3763/ASRE.2007.5005
[3]   Comparison of the Vignetting Effects of Two Identical Fisheye Lenses [J].
Cauwerts, Coralie ;
Bodart, Magali ;
Deneyer, Arnaud .
LEUKOS, 2012, 8 (03) :181-203
[4]  
Dilaura D., 2011, IESNA Lighting Handbook, Vtenth
[5]   Current daylighting design practice: a survey [J].
Galasiu, Anca D. ;
Reinhart, Christoph F. .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2008, 36 (02) :159-174
[6]  
Inanici MN, 2006, LIGHTING RES TECHNOL, V38, P123, DOI 10.1191/13657828061i164oa
[7]   Evalution of High Dynamic Range Image-Based Sky Models in Lighting Simulation [J].
Inanici, Mehlika .
LEUKOS, 2010, 7 (02) :69-84
[8]  
LBNL, 2016, LBNL COMPL GLAZ DAT
[9]   MODELING DAYLIGHT AVAILABILITY AND IRRADIANCE COMPONENTS FROM DIRECT AND GLOBAL IRRADIANCE [J].
PEREZ, R ;
INEICHEN, P ;
SEALS, R ;
MICHALSKY, J ;
STEWART, R .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1990, 44 (05) :271-289
[10]   The daylighting dashboard - A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces [J].
Reinhart, Christoph F. ;
Wienold, Jan .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (02) :386-396