The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias

被引:83
作者
Heeren, Alexandre [1 ]
De Raedt, Rudi [2 ]
Koster, Ernst H. W. [2 ]
Philippot, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Psychol Sci Res Inst, Lab Expt Psychopathol, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Clin & Hlth Psychol, Psychopathol & Affect Neurosci Lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 7卷
关键词
attentional bias; cognitive bias modification; experimental psychopathology; neuromodulation; DLPFC; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SOCIAL ANXIETY; EMOTIONAL INFORMATION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; THREAT; AMYGDALA; STIMULI; INHIBITION; PLASTICITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recently, researchers have investigated the causal nature of attentional bias for threat (AB) in the maintenance of anxiety disorders by experimentally manipulating it. They found that training anxious individuals to attend to non-threat stimuli reduces AB, which, in turn, reduces anxiety. This effect supports the hypothesis that AB can causally impact the maintenance of anxiety. At a fundamental level, however, uncertainty still abounds regarding the nature of the processes that mediate this effect. In the present paper, we propose that two contrasting approaches may be derived from theoretical accounts of AB. According to a first class of models, called the "valence-specific bias" models, modifying AB requires the modification of valence-specific attentional selectivity. According to a second class of models, called the "attention control models," modifying AB requires the modification of attention control, driven by the recruitment of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We formulate a series of specific predictions, to provide suggestions to trial these two approaches one against the other. This knowledge is critical for understanding the mechanisms of AB in anxiety disorders, which bares important clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   Training implicit social anxiety associations: An experimental intervention [J].
Clerkin, Elise M. ;
Teachman, Bethany A. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2010, 24 (03) :300-308
[12]   Affective learning enhances activity and functional connectivity in early visual cortex [J].
Damaraju, Eswar ;
Huang, Yang-Ming ;
Barrett, Lisa Feldman ;
Pessoa, Luiz .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (12) :2480-2487
[13]   The amygdala: vigilance and emotion [J].
Davis, M ;
Whalen, PJ .
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 6 (01) :13-34
[14]   Neurocognitive effects of HF-rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the attentional processing of emotional information in healthy women: An event-related fMRI study [J].
De Raedt, Rudi ;
Leyman, Lemke ;
Baeken, Chris ;
Van Schuerbeek, Peter ;
Luypaert, Rob ;
Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne ;
Dannlowski, Udo .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 85 (03) :487-495
[15]   Anxiety, Inhibition, Efficiency, and Effectiveness An Investigation Using the Antisaccade Task [J].
Derakshan, Nazanin ;
Ansari, Tahereh L. ;
Hansard, Miles ;
Shoker, Leor ;
Eysenck, Michael W. .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 56 (01) :48-55
[16]   Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control [J].
Derryberry, D ;
Reed, MA .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 111 (02) :225-236
[17]   Neural plasticity in response to attention training in anxiety [J].
Eldar, S. ;
Bar-Haim, Y. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (04) :667-677
[18]   Contextual and social influences on valuation and choice [J].
Engelmann, Jan B. ;
Hein, Grit .
DECISION MAKING: NEURAL AND BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHES, 2013, 202 :215-237
[19]   Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory [J].
Eysenck, Michael W. ;
Derakshan, Nazanin ;
Santos, Rita ;
Calvo, Manuel G. .
EMOTION, 2007, 7 (02) :336-353
[20]   New perspectives in attentional control theory [J].
Eysenck, Michael W. ;
Derakshan, Nazanin .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (07) :955-960