Environmental management systems, practices and outcomes: Differences in resource allocation between small and large firms

被引:38
作者
Wong, Christina W. Y. [1 ]
Wong, Chee Yew [2 ]
Boon-itt, Sakun [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Thammasat Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Environmental management; Performance; Large firms; Small firms; Resource allocation; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL SLACK; GREEN; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY; IMPACT; STANDARDS; BEHAVIOR; SMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107734
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper argues both small and large firms use different resource allocation patterns to benefit from implementing environmental management practices (EMPs) and environmental management systems (EMS). Results from the multi-group structural equation analyses of a survey of manufacturing firms in two countries support the resource allocation arguments - large firms use resource-demanding EMPs such as green product design and green production to improve outcomes in environmental, cost-reduction and business performance, while small firms choose resource-light EMPs such as green logistics and green packaging to gain only environmental and cost-reduction benefits. The paper advances the existing resource-advantage view by revealing different resource allocation patterns and provides meaningful recommendations through which policy makers can address various resource allocation constraints among small and large enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[2]  
Ammenberg J., 2003, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V12, P163, DOI 10.1002/bse.357
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, PRACTICAL ISSUES STR
[5]   Environmental strategy and performance in small firms:: A resource-based perspective [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Hurtado-Torres, Nuria ;
Sharma, Sanjay ;
Garcia-Morales, Victor J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) :88-103
[6]   Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment [J].
Aragon-Correa, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (05) :556-567
[7]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[8]  
Arnold C., 2019, FDN EC WORLDWIDE SMA
[9]  
Banerjee S.B., 2001, Management Decision, V39, P36, DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005405
[10]   Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Large Firms: Size Matters [J].
Baumann-Pauly, Dorothee ;
Wickert, Christopher ;
Spence, Laura J. ;
Scherer, Andreas Georg .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 115 (04) :693-705