Environmental management systems, practices and outcomes: Differences in resource allocation between small and large firms

被引:37
作者
Wong, Christina W. Y. [1 ]
Wong, Chee Yew [2 ]
Boon-itt, Sakun [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Thammasat Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Environmental management; Performance; Large firms; Small firms; Resource allocation; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL SLACK; GREEN; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY; IMPACT; STANDARDS; BEHAVIOR; SMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107734
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper argues both small and large firms use different resource allocation patterns to benefit from implementing environmental management practices (EMPs) and environmental management systems (EMS). Results from the multi-group structural equation analyses of a survey of manufacturing firms in two countries support the resource allocation arguments - large firms use resource-demanding EMPs such as green product design and green production to improve outcomes in environmental, cost-reduction and business performance, while small firms choose resource-light EMPs such as green logistics and green packaging to gain only environmental and cost-reduction benefits. The paper advances the existing resource-advantage view by revealing different resource allocation patterns and provides meaningful recommendations through which policy makers can address various resource allocation constraints among small and large enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview
    Ambec, Stefan
    Lanoie, Paul
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) : 45 - 62
  • [2] Ammenberg J., 2003, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V12, P163, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.357
  • [3] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH
    ANDERSON, JC
    GERBING, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 411 - 423
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Methods Psychological Research Online
  • [5] Environmental strategy and performance in small firms:: A resource-based perspective
    Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto
    Hurtado-Torres, Nuria
    Sharma, Sanjay
    Garcia-Morales, Victor J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) : 88 - 103
  • [6] Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment
    Aragon-Correa, JA
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (05) : 556 - 567
  • [7] ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS
    ARMSTRONG, JS
    OVERTON, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) : 396 - 402
  • [8] Arnold C., 2019, FDN EC WORLDWIDE SMA
  • [9] Banerjee SB., 2001, MANAGE DECIS, V39, P36, DOI [DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005405, 10.1108/EUM0000000005405]
  • [10] Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Large Firms: Size Matters
    Baumann-Pauly, Dorothee
    Wickert, Christopher
    Spence, Laura J.
    Scherer, Andreas Georg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 115 (04) : 693 - 705