Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury

被引:48
作者
Craven, Catharine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hitzig, Sander L. [1 ,4 ]
Mittmann, Nicole [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Lyndhurst Ctr, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Clin Pharmacol, Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon HOPE Res Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Pharmacol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Western Ontario, Int Ctr Hlth Innovat, Richard Ivey Sch Business, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Health status; Outcomes assessment (health care); Quality of life; Spinal cord injuries; Tetraplegia; Paraplegia; Utility theory; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UTILITIES INDEX; ONTARIO; MULTIATTRIBUTE; COMPLICATIONS; INDIVIDUALS; INSTRUMENTS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Context/objectives: To describe the relationships between secondary health conditions and health preference in a cohort of adults with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Study design: Cross-sectional telephone survey. Setting: Community. Participants: Community-dwelling adult men and women (N= 357) with chronic traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (C1-L3 AIS A-D) who were at least 1 year post-injury/onset. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome measures: Health Utilities Index-Mark III (HUI-Mark III) and SCI Secondary Conditions Scale-Modified (SCS-M). Results: SCS-M responses for different secondary health conditions were used to create "low impact = absent/mild" and "high impact = moderate/significant" secondary health condition groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in HUI-Mark III scores for different secondary health conditions while controlling for impairment. The mean HUI-Mark III was 0.24 (0.27, range, -0.28 to 1.00). HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.001) in high impact groups for spasms, bladder and bowel dysfunction, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, circulatory problems, respiratory problems, chronic pain, joint pain, psychological distress, and depression compared with the low impact groups. As well, HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.05) in high impact groups for pressure sores, unintentional injuries, contractures, heterotopic bone ossification, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, cardiac problems, and neurological deterioration than low-impact groups. Conclusion: High-impact secondary health conditions are negatively associated with health preference in persons with SCI. Although further work is required, the HUI-Mark III data may be a useful tool for calculating quality-adjusted life years, and advocating for additional resources where secondary health conditions have substantial adverse impact on health.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 370
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) [J].
Adachi, JD ;
Ioannidis, G ;
Pickard, L ;
Berger, C ;
Prior, JC ;
Joseph, L ;
Hanley, DA ;
Olszynski, WP ;
Murray, TM ;
Anastassiades, T ;
Hopman, W ;
Brown, JP ;
Kirkland, S ;
Joyce, C ;
Papaioannou, A ;
Poliquin, S ;
Tenenhouse, A ;
Papadimitropoulos, EA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (11) :895-904
[2]   Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Fouts, BS ;
Romeis, JC ;
Brownson, CA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (08) :877-884
[3]   Health Utilities Index Mark 3 showed valid in Alzheimer disease, arthritis, and cataracts [J].
Asakawa, Keiko ;
Rolfson, Darryl ;
Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan ;
Feeny, David ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (07) :733-739
[4]   Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients? [J].
Blanchard, C ;
Feeny, D ;
Mahon, JRL ;
Bourne, R ;
Rorabeck, C ;
Stitt, L ;
Webster-Bogaert, S .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) :339-348
[5]   Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? [J].
Bowling, A .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (05) :342-345
[6]   RELIABILITY OF THE HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX - MARK-III USED IN THE 1991 CYCLE-6 CANADIAN GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
FURLONG, W ;
FEENY, D ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
HATCHER, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (03) :249-257
[7]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[8]   Incidence rates and populations at risk for spinal cord injury: A regional study [J].
Burke, DA ;
Linden, RD ;
Zhang, YP ;
Maiste, AC ;
Shields, CB .
SPINAL CORD, 2001, 39 (05) :274-278
[9]   A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III:: Rasch psychometric validation [J].
Catz, A. ;
Itzkovich, M. ;
Tesio, L. ;
Biering-Sorensen, F. ;
Weeks, C. ;
Laramee, M. T. ;
Craven, B. C. ;
Tonack, M. ;
Hitzig, S. L. ;
Glaser, E. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Soni, B. M. ;
Gardner, B. P. ;
Savic, G. ;
Bergstrom, E. M. ;
Bluvshtein, V. ;
Ronen, J. .
SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (04) :275-291
[10]   Characteristics of adults with incident traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada [J].
Couris, C. M. ;
Guilcher, S. J. T. ;
Munce, S. E. P. ;
Fung, K. ;
Craven, B. C. ;
Verrier, M. ;
Jaglal, S. B. .
SPINAL CORD, 2010, 48 (01) :39-44