An Overview of Benchmarks Regarding Quality Assurance for eLearning in Higher Education

被引:0
作者
Yeung, C. L. [1 ]
Zhou, Laura [1 ]
Armatas, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Educ Dev Ctr, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
2019 IEEE CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, E-MANAGEMENT & E- SERVICES (IC3E) | 2019年
关键词
eLearning; quality assurance; higher education; benchmarks;
D O I
10.1109/ic3e47558.2019.8971808
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The application of technology in teaching and learning or eLearning has become a future trend in higher education around the globe. Although it is evolved from conventional teaching and learning, it has distinct features and therefore researchers classify eLearning as a discrete educational form. In the past decade, considerable efforts have been made on investigating the applications or developing models or frameworks regarding eLearning. Limited studies have been conducted to address eLearning quality or quality assurance issues. As nowadays eLearning is extensively adopted in higher education, universities or institutions are accountable for its quality. Quality assurance can be carried out through benchmarking or assessments by the specification of standards. Many national bodies and organizations have established various benchmarks, standards and rubrics to describe or assess the eLearning quality. However, researchers indicated that it is challenging to conduct benchmarking in universities. The main reason is that there is a great diversity of courses or teaching approaches, particularly in eLearning. In this study, a comprehensive review of benchmarks that are available worldwide to assist institutions to support continuously quality assurance or improvement in eLearning has been conducted. The aim of this review is to identify the main eLearning categories and investigate which benchmarks are suitable for each category. Keywords searching was adopted to identify the relevant eLearning benchmarks to be included in this review. Results indicated that 17 sets of benchmarks have been identified and classified into 5 main categories. This paper also describes the uniquenesses of these benchmarks. In addition, the covered areas of these benchmarks will be compared. Suggestions for future research are also addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 45
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] E-learning quality assurance: a process-oriented lifecycle model
    Abdous, M'hammed
    [J]. QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2009, 17 (03) : 281 - +
  • [2] Bacsich P., 2011, DISTANCE LEARNING BE
  • [3] California State University, 2018, QUAL ASS QUAL ONL LE
  • [4] Ebba O., QUALITY MODELS ONLIN
  • [5] ECB Check, 2016, ELEARNING QUAL
  • [6] European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), 2016, QUAL I
  • [7] FIU Online, 2016, BEN QUAL MATT CERT W
  • [8] Gaebel M., 2014, E LEARNING EUROPEAN
  • [9] HARMAN G., 2000, Repositioning quality assurance and accreditation in Australian higher education
  • [10] Hinck G., 2017, APPL OLC BLENDED LEA