Trust and Information Sharing in Supply Chains

被引:96
作者
Ebrahim-Khanjari, Neda [1 ]
Hopp, Wallace [2 ]
Iravani, Seyed M. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
supply chain; trust; information sharing; salesperson; social characteristics; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; ORGANIZATIONS; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY; MANAGEMENT; EXCHANGE; FAIRNESS; BEHAVIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01284.x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Drawing on behavioral research, we construct a multi-period model with which to examine the role of trust and other social characteristics in a supply chain. Specifically, we focus on trust building in the context of a salesperson who acts as a representative of a manufacturer and shares demand forecast information with a retailer. The actions of the salesperson affect both her immediate economic gain and her future credibility as determined by retailer's trust. Our analysis reveals that, in such environments, although salespersons of widely varying types (e.g., honest, self-serving, benevolent, loyal) lie some extent about their forecast information, they tend to be trusted in long relationships, provided their forecasting accuracy is higher than that of the retailer. Furthermore, while the presence of a salesperson can improve the profits of both the retailer and manufacturer, there are cost structures under which the manufacturer is better off without a salesperson. Finally, we make the general observation that the appropriate salesperson compensation scheme depends on her social characteristics, and the specific observation that when the salesperson cares for the retailer, the linear compensation scheme commonly suggested in the literature as the optimal compensation scheme for the salesperson is no longer optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 464
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Anderson Erin., 2002, Handbook of Marketing, P223
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MEANINGS TRUST
[3]   The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance [J].
Aviv, Y .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (10) :1326-1343
[4]   Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions [J].
Bendoly, Elliot ;
Donohue, Karen ;
Schultz, Kenneth L. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (06) :737-752
[5]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[6]   Trust, risk and betrayal [J].
Bohnet, I ;
Zeckhauser, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 55 (04) :467-484
[7]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[8]   Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Fisher, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (08) :1032-1048
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE AFFECT AND VISUAL ACCESS ON THE DISCOVERY OF INTEGRATIVE SOLUTIONS IN BILATERAL NEGOTIATION [J].
CARNEVALE, PJD ;
ISEN, AM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 37 (01) :1-13
[10]   Understanding social preferences with simple tests [J].
Charness, G ;
Rabin, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03) :817-869