Practical methods for improving dose distributions in Monte Carlo-based IMRT planning of lung wall-seated tumors treated with SBRT

被引:14
作者
Altman, Michael B. [1 ]
Jin, Jian-Yue [1 ]
Kim, Sangroh [1 ]
Wen, Ning [1 ]
Liu, Dezhi [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. Salim [1 ]
Ajlouni, Munther I. [1 ]
Movsas, Benjamin [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
SBRT; treatment planning; Monte Carlo; IMRT; lung; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CELL-DENSITY; ORGAN MOTION; PHOTON; SYSTEM; CANCER; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.4007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Current commercially available planning systems with Monte Carlo (MC)-based final dose calculation in IMRT planning employ pencil-beam (PB) algorithms in the optimization process. Consequently, dose coverage for SBRT lung plans can feature cold-spots at the interface between lung and tumor tissue. For lung wall (LW)-seated tumors, there can also be hot spots within nearby normal organs (example: ribs). This study evaluated two different practical approaches to limiting cold spots within the target and reducing high doses to surrounding normal organs in MC-based IMRT planning of LW-seated tumors. First, "iterative reoptimization", where the MC calculation (with PB-based optimization) is initially performed. The resultant cold spot is then contoured and used as a simultaneous boost volume. The MC-based dose is then recomputed. The second technique uses noncoplanar beam angles with limited path through lung tissue. Both techniques were evaluated against a conventional coplanar beam approach with a single MC calculation. In all techniques the prescription dose was normalized to cover 95% of the PTV. Fifteen SBRT lung cases with LW-seated tumors were planned. The results from iterative reoptimization showed that conformity index (CI) and/or PTV dose uniformity (U-PTV) improved in 12/15 plans. Average improvement was 13%, and 24%, respectively. Nonimproved plans had PTVs near the skin, trachea, and/or very small lung involvement. The maximum dose to 1cc volume (D1cc) of surrounding OARs decreased in 14/15 plans (average 10%). Using noncoplanar beams showed an average improvement of 7% in 10/15 cases and 11% in 5/15 cases for CI and U-PTV, respectively. The D1cc was reduced by an average of 6% in 10/15 cases to surrounding OARs. Choice of treatment planning technique did not statistically significantly change lung V5. The results showed that the proposed practical approaches enhance dose conformity in MC-based IMRT planning of lung tumors treated with SBRT, improving target dose coverage and potentially reducing toxicities to surrounding normal organs.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 125
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Restricted field imrt dramatically enhances IMRT planning for mesothelioma [J].
Allen, Aaron M. ;
Schofield, Deborah ;
Hacker, Fred ;
Court, Laurence E. ;
Czerminska, Maria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (05) :1587-1592
[2]   Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101 [J].
Benedict, Stanley H. ;
Yenice, Kamil M. ;
Followill, David ;
Galvin, James M. ;
Hinson, William ;
Kavanagh, Brian ;
Keall, Paul ;
Lovelock, Michael ;
Meeks, Sanford ;
Papiez, Lech ;
Purdie, Thomas ;
Sadagopan, Ramaswamy ;
Schell, Michael C. ;
Salter, Bill ;
Schlesinger, David J. ;
Shiu, Almon S. ;
Solberg, Timothy ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Stieber, Volker ;
Timmerman, Robert ;
Tome, Wolfgang A. ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Wang, Lu ;
Yin, Fang-Fang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (08) :4078-4101
[3]   Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Charland, PM ;
Tyagi, N ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Bielajew, AF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (04) :563-573
[4]   Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning [J].
Chetty, Indrin J. ;
Curran, Bruce ;
Cygler, Joanna E. ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
Ezzell, Gary ;
Faddegon, Bruce A. ;
Kawrakow, Iwan ;
Keall, Paul J. ;
Liu, Helen ;
Ma, C. -M. Charlie ;
Rogers, D. W. O. ;
Seuntjens, Jan ;
Sheikh-Bagheri, Daryoush ;
Siebers, Jeffrey V. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) :4818-4853
[5]   CHEST WALL VOLUME RECEIVING >30 GY PREDICTS RISK OF SEVERE PAIN AND/OR RIB FRACTURE AFTER LUNG STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY [J].
Dunlap, Neal E. ;
Cai, Jing ;
Biedermann, Gregory B. ;
Yang, Wensha ;
Benedict, Stanley H. ;
Sheng, Ke ;
Schefter, Tracey E. ;
Kavanagh, Brian D. ;
Larner, James M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :796-801
[6]   STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY FOR EARLY-STAGE NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CARCINOMA: FOUR-YEAR RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE PHASE II STUDY [J].
Fakiris, Achilles J. ;
McGarry, Ronald C. ;
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. ;
Papiez, Lech ;
Williams, Mark ;
Henderson, Mark A. ;
Timmerman, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03) :677-682
[7]   Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning [J].
Fragoso, Margarida ;
Wen, Ning ;
Kumar, Sanath ;
Liu, Dezhi ;
Ryu, Samuel ;
Movsas, Benjamin ;
Munther, Ajlouni ;
Chetty, Indrin J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16) :4445-4464
[8]   Dosimetric validation of a commercial Monte Carlo based IMRT planning system [J].
Grofsmid, Dennis ;
Dirkx, Maarten ;
Marijnissen, Hans ;
Woudstra, Evert ;
Heijmen, Ben .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (02) :540-549
[9]   Dosimetric evaluation of the clinical implementation of the first commercial IMRT Monte Carlo treatment planning system at 6 MV [J].
Heath, E ;
Seuntjens, J ;
Sheikh-Bagheri, D .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2771-2779
[10]   Adaptation of GEANT4 to Monte Carlo dose calculations based on CT data [J].
Jiang, H ;
Paganetti, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2811-2818