A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for the Evaluation of Train Control Information Systems, the Case of ERTMS

被引:8
|
作者
Krmac, Evelin [1 ]
Djordjevic, Boban [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Maritime Studies & Transport, Pot Pomorscakov 4, SI-6320 Portoroz, Slovenia
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; AHP; SWOT; ERTMS; train control information system; TCIS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION; RAILWAY SYSTEMS; MAIN-LINE; SAFETY; CRITERIA; MODEL; RISK; INFRASTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622018500451
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The huge potential offered by the implementation of a modern Train Control Information System (TCIS) could result in significant improvements in the railway sector in general. As a technology transfer, primarily in the European railway sector, the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is expected to play an important role in providing better railway performances. However, the implementation of ERTMS entails certain dilemmas and disadvantages and the decision-making regarding it can be one of the crucial challenges for each railway. Having this in mind, the aim of this work is to propose a decision-making framework to support such a critical decision process through application of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analyses. In the proposed approach, external and internal factors that simultaneously enhance and constrain ERTMS implementation were identified and presented through the SWOT analysis, while the AHP method was applied for the evaluation of the importance of identified factors. The thorough literature review represents a basis for creating a SWOT matrix and setting of judgments for the evaluation of the SWOT factors. The results of the AHP method highlight the importance of the factors within the SWOT matrix regarding ERTMS implementation. Results of the AHP method were checked by two additional weight assessments in order to provide the appropriate approach for factor evaluation. The proposed approach also shows a relatively simple and very suitable decision-making framework for consideration of other TCISs, too.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 239
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Financial performance evaluation by multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Turegun, Nida
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (05)
  • [12] An integrated information fusion and grey multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection
    Aslani, Babak
    Rabiee, Meysam
    Tavana, Madjid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE-OPERATIONS & LOGISTICS, 2021, 8 (04) : 348 - 370
  • [13] Multi-criteria Decision-Making for Greenways: The Case of Trabzon, Turkey
    Turk, Ersin
    PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (03): : 326 - 343
  • [14] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for online controlled experiments in a launch decision-making framework
    Wu, Jie J. W.
    Mazzuchi, Thomas A.
    Sarkani, Shahram
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 155
  • [15] Evaluation of the Suitability of Urban Underground Space Development Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Geographic Information Systems
    Zhang, Peixing
    Jin, Tianlu
    Wang, Meng
    Zhou, Na
    Jia, Xueting
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [16] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan
    Akhanova, Gulzhanat
    Nadeem, Abid
    Kim, Jong R.
    Azhar, Salman
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
  • [17] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Example of an Explainable Classification Framework
    Yusuf, Hesham
    Yang, Kai
    Panoutsos, George
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2022, 1409 : 15 - 26
  • [18] Collaborative Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Evaluation of Design Scenarios for PSS Heating Systems
    Maliqi, Mariza
    Boucher, Xavier
    Villot, Jonathan
    Lamy, Damien
    NAVIGATING UNPREDICTABILITY: COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN NON-LINEAR WORLDS, PRO-VE 2024, PT II, 2024, 727 : 316 - 330
  • [19] Multi-criteria decision-making method for evaluation of investment in enhanced geothermal systems projects
    Raos, Sara
    Hranic, Josipa
    Rajsl, Ivan
    ENERGY AND AI, 2024, 17
  • [20] Multi-criteria group decision-making approach with linguistic assessment information
    School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    Kongzhi yu Juece Control Decis, 2007, 5 (545-548+553):