A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for the Evaluation of Train Control Information Systems, the Case of ERTMS

被引:8
作者
Krmac, Evelin [1 ]
Djordjevic, Boban [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Maritime Studies & Transport, Pot Pomorscakov 4, SI-6320 Portoroz, Slovenia
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; AHP; SWOT; ERTMS; train control information system; TCIS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION; RAILWAY SYSTEMS; MAIN-LINE; SAFETY; CRITERIA; MODEL; RISK; INFRASTRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622018500451
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The huge potential offered by the implementation of a modern Train Control Information System (TCIS) could result in significant improvements in the railway sector in general. As a technology transfer, primarily in the European railway sector, the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is expected to play an important role in providing better railway performances. However, the implementation of ERTMS entails certain dilemmas and disadvantages and the decision-making regarding it can be one of the crucial challenges for each railway. Having this in mind, the aim of this work is to propose a decision-making framework to support such a critical decision process through application of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analyses. In the proposed approach, external and internal factors that simultaneously enhance and constrain ERTMS implementation were identified and presented through the SWOT analysis, while the AHP method was applied for the evaluation of the importance of identified factors. The thorough literature review represents a basis for creating a SWOT matrix and setting of judgments for the evaluation of the SWOT factors. The results of the AHP method highlight the importance of the factors within the SWOT matrix regarding ERTMS implementation. Results of the AHP method were checked by two additional weight assessments in order to provide the appropriate approach for factor evaluation. The proposed approach also shows a relatively simple and very suitable decision-making framework for consideration of other TCISs, too.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 239
页数:31
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Abed Sajed K., 2010, 2010 1st International Conference on Energy, Power and Control (EPC-IQ 2010), P173
[2]   Complementary positioning system in GNSS-denied areas [J].
Adin, I. ;
Mendizabal, J. ;
de Miguel, G. ;
Goya, J. ;
Zamora, L. ;
Arrizabalaga, S. .
TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 :4562-4571
[3]   Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis of carbon footprint indicator and derived recommendations [J].
Alvarez, Sergio ;
Carballo-Penela, Adolfo ;
Mateo-Mantecon, Ingrid ;
Rubio, Agustin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 121 :238-247
[4]   A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: A railway risk management system [J].
An, Min ;
Chen, Yao ;
Baker, Chris J. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2011, 181 (18) :3946-3966
[5]   Using Bounded Model Checking for Coverage Analysis of Safety-Critical Software in an Industrial Setting [J].
Angeletti, Damiano ;
Giunchiglia, Enrico ;
Narizzano, Massimo ;
Puddu, Alessandra ;
Sabina, Salvatore .
JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2010, 45 (04) :397-414
[6]  
[Anonymous], T PROB
[7]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN MODELLING ASSI
[8]   A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul [J].
Aydin, Nezir ;
Celik, Erkan ;
Gumus, Alev Taskin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 77 :61-81
[9]  
Balan M., EC IMPACT INTRO INFO
[10]   An early warning system for detecting GSM-R wireless interference in the high-speed railway infrastructure [J].
Baldini, Gianmarco ;
Fouino, Igor Nai ;
Masera, Marcelo ;
Luise, Marco ;
Pellegrini, Vincenzo ;
Bagagli, Enzo ;
Rubino, Giuseppe ;
Malangone, Raffaele ;
Stefano, Marcoccio ;
Senesi, Fabio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2010, 3 (3-4) :140-156