High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:23
作者
Yamazaki, Hideya [1 ]
Masui, Koji [1 ]
Suzuki, Gen [1 ]
Nakamura, Satoaki [1 ]
Yamada, Kei [1 ]
Okihara, Koji [2 ]
Shiraishi, Takumi [2 ]
Yoshida, Ken [3 ]
Kotsuma, Tadayuki [3 ]
Tanaka, Eiichi [3 ]
Otani, Keisuke [4 ]
Yoshioka, Yasuo [4 ]
Ogawa, Kazuhiko [4 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; High dose rate; Low dose rate; Brachytherapy; RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; ANDROGEN-DEPRIVATION THERAPY; PERMANENT BRACHYTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; TOXICITIES; FRACTIONS; SOCIETY; PHASE-3; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the outcome of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and materials: We compared 352 patients treated with HDR-BT as monotherapy (median follow-up time 84 months, NCCN risk classification; low: intermediate: high = 28: 145: 179) and 486 patients with LDR-BT with or without EBRT (90 months, 194: 254: 38). HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. LDR-BT excluded patients with T3b-T4 tumor and initial PSA > 50 ng/ml. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) involving propensity scores was used to reduce background selection bias. Results: The actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates (bNED) were 92.9% and 95.6% (p = 0.25) in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively, and it was 100% and 97.3% (p = 0.99) in the low-risk, 95.6% and 94.3% (p = 0.19) in the intermediate, 89.6% and 94.9% (p = 0.26) in the high-risk groups, and 93.1% and 94.9% (p = 0.98) in selected high-risk group excluding T3b-4 and initial PSA >= 50. IPTW correction also indicated no difference in bNED between LDR-BT and HDR-BT groups. LDR-BT showed a higher incidence of genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade >= 2 than that of HDR-BT in the acute phase and grade 1 toxicity in late phase. Acute GU toxicity grade >= 1 predicted late GU toxicity grade >= 2. External beam radiotherapy plus LDR-BT elevated GI toxicity than LDR-BT only group. Accumulated incidence of late grade >= 2 GU and GU toxicity was equivalent between HDR-BT and LDR-BT. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were detected in either modality. Conclusion: HDR-BT monotherapy showed an equivalent outcome to that of LDR-BT with or without EBRT for low-, intermediate-and selected high-risk patients. LDR-BT showed equivalent incidence of grade >= 2 late GI and GU toxicities and higher grade >= 2 acute GU toxicity as that of HDR-BT as a monotherapy. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACT GUID
[2]   The American College of Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer [J].
Bittner, Nathan H. J. ;
Orio, Peter F., III ;
Merrick, Gregory S. ;
Prestidge, Bradley R. ;
Hartford, Alan Charles ;
Rosenthal, Seth A. .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (01) :59-67
[3]   Brachytherapy for Patients With Prostate Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario Joint Guideline Update [J].
Chin, Joseph ;
Rumble, R. Bryan ;
Kollmeier, Marisa ;
Heath, Elisabeth ;
Efstathiou, Jason ;
Dorff, Tanya ;
Berman, Barry ;
Feifer, Andrew ;
Jacques, Arthur ;
Loblaw, D. Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (15) :1737-+
[4]   High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy Delivered in Two Fractions Within One Day for Favorable/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Toxicity Data [J].
Ghilezan, Michel ;
Martinez, Alvaro ;
Gustason, Gary ;
Krauss, Daniel ;
Antonucci, J. Vito ;
Chen, Peter ;
Fontanesi, James ;
Wallace, Michelle ;
Ye, Hong ;
Casey, Alyse ;
Sebastian, Evelyn ;
Kim, Leonard ;
Limbacher, Amy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03) :927-932
[5]   High dose rate brachytherapy as prostate cancer monotherapy reduces toxicity compared to low dose rate palladium seeds [J].
Grills, IS ;
Martinez, AA ;
Hollander, M ;
Huang, RW ;
Goldman, K ;
Chen, PY ;
Gustafson, GS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (03) :1098-1104
[6]   High-dose-rate brachytherapy with two or three fractions as monotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer [J].
Hoskin, Peter ;
Rojas, Ana ;
Ostler, Peter ;
Hughes, Robert ;
Alonzi, Roberto ;
Lowe, Gerry ;
Bryant, Linda .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) :63-67
[7]   Direct 2-Arm Comparison Shows Benefit of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost vs External Beam Radiation Therapy Alone for Prostate Cancer [J].
Khor, Richard ;
Duchesne, Gillian ;
Tai, Keen-Hun ;
Foroudi, Farshad ;
Chander, Sarat ;
Van Dyk, Sylvia ;
Garth, Margaret ;
Williams, Scott .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (03) :679-685
[8]   Evaluation of dosimetry and excess seeds in permanent brachytherapy using a modified hybrid method: a single-institution experience [J].
Kobayashi, Kana ;
Okihara, Koji ;
Iwata, Tsuyoshi ;
Aibe, Norihiro ;
Kodani, Naohiro ;
Tsubokura, Takuji ;
Kamoi, Kazumi ;
Miki, Tsuneharu ;
Yamazaki, Hideya .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (03) :479-484
[9]   Magnetic resonance imaging-based salvage brachytherapy: Moving toward a focal paradigm [J].
Kollmeier, Marisa A. ;
Zelefsky, Michael ;
McBride, Sean .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (04) :770-777
[10]   LACK OF BENEFIT FOR THE ADDITION OF ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY TO DOSE-ESCALATED RADIOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF INTERMEDIATE- AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Krauss, Daniel ;
Kestin, Larry ;
Ye, Hong ;
Brabbins, Donald ;
Ghilezan, Michel ;
Gustafson, Gary ;
Vicini, Frank ;
Martinez, Alvaro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04) :1064-1071