Perioperative patient-specific factors-based nomograms predict short-term periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty

被引:4
|
作者
Fu, Guangtao [1 ]
Li, Mengyuan [1 ]
Xue, Yunlian [2 ]
Li, Qingtian [1 ]
Deng, Zhantao [1 ]
Ma, Yuanchen [1 ]
Zheng, Qiujian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Div Orthoped, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Div Stat, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Prediction tool; Nomogram; Periprosthetic bone loss; Total hip arthroplasty; Gruen zones; MINERAL DENSITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; FRACTURE; QUALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-020-02034-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although medical intervention of periprosthetic bone loss in the immediate postoperative period was recommended, not all the patients experienced periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prediction tools that enrolled all potential risk factors to calculate an individualized prediction of postoperative periprosthetic bone loss were strongly needed for clinical decision-making. Methods Data of the patients who underwent primary unilateral cementless THA between April 2015 and October 2017 in our center were retrospectively collected. Candidate variables included demographic data and bone mineral density (BMD) in spine, hip, and periprosthetic regions that measured 1 week after THA. Outcomes of interest included the risk of postoperative periprosthetic bone loss in Gruen zone 1, 7, and total zones in the 1st postoperative year. Nomograms were presented based on multiple logistic regressions via R language. One thousand Bootstraps were used for internal validation. Results Five hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and the final analysis was performed in 427 patients (195 male and 232 female) after the exclusion. The mean BMD of Gruen zone 1, 7, and total were decreased by 4.1%, 6.4%, and 1.7% at the 1st year after THA, respectively. 61.1% of the patients (261/427) experienced bone loss in Gruen zone 1 at the 1st postoperative year, while there were 58.1% (248/427) in Gruen zone 7 and 63.0% (269/427) in Gruen zone total. Bias-corrected C-index for risk of postoperative bone loss in Gruen zone 1, 7, and total zones in the 1(st) postoperative year were 0.700, 0.785, and 0.696, respectively. The most highly influential factors for the postoperative periprosthetic bone loss were primary diagnosis and BMD in the corresponding Gruen zones at the baseline. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, our study represented the first time to use the nomograms in estimating the risk of postoperative periprosthetic bone loss with adequate predictive discrimination and calibration. Those predictive models would help surgeons to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from anti-bone-resorptive treatment in the early postoperative period effectively. It is also beneficial for patients, as they can choose the treatment options based on a reasonable expectation following surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative patient-specific factors-based nomograms predict short-term periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty
    Guangtao Fu
    Mengyuan Li
    Yunlian Xue
    Qingtian Li
    Zhantao Deng
    Yuanchen Ma
    Qiujian Zheng
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [2] Patient Factors Predict Periprosthetic Fractures After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Lewallen, David G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (08) : 1507 - 1512
  • [3] Influential factors in bisphosphonates for periprosthetic bone loss after total joint arthroplasty
    Lin, Tiao
    Zuo, Xi
    Yan, Shi-Gui
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2014, 19 (01) : 199 - 203
  • [4] Short-Term Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Liver Transplantation
    Oya, Akihito
    Umezu, Taro
    Ogawa, Ryo
    Nishiwaki, Toru
    Niki, Yasuo
    Nakamura, Masaya
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Kanaji, Arihiko
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 8 : 11 - 14
  • [5] Patient-Specific Instrumentation Affects Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cucchi, Davide
    Menon, Alessandra
    Zanini, Beatrice
    Compagnoni, Riccardo
    Ferrua, Paolo
    Randelli, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [6] Patient-specific mobility assessment to monitor recovery after total hip arthroplasty
    Gargiulo, Paolo
    Edmunds, Kyle Joseph
    Gislason, Magnus K.
    Latour, Chase
    Hermannsson, Thostur
    Esposito, Luca
    Bifulco, Paolo
    Cesarelli, Mario
    Fraldi, Massimiliano
    Cristofolini, Luca
    Jonsson, Halldor, Jr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 232 (10) : 1048 - 1059
  • [7] Frank Stinchfield Award: Creation of a Patient-Specific Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fracture Risk Calculator
    Wyles, Cody C.
    Maradit-Kremers, Hilal
    Fruth, Kristin M.
    Larson, Dirk R.
    Khosravi, Bardia
    Rouzrokh, Pouria
    Johnson, Quinn J.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Taunton, Michael J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S2 - S10
  • [8] Impact factors of perioperative hidden blood loss after total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients
    Shen, Jian-Lin
    Gu, Jun
    Lin, Su-Bin
    Li, Qiang
    Li, Liu-Bing
    Dong, Qi-Rong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (05): : 8599 - 8604
  • [9] Fluoride concentration in bone influences periprosthetic bone mineral loss after uncemented total hip arthroplasty
    Bohatyrewicz, A
    Gusta, A
    Bialecki, P
    Ogonski, T
    Dabkowska, E
    Spoz, A
    Machoy, Z
    FLUORIDE, 1999, 32 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [10] Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling After Novel Short-Stem Neck-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Phong Tran
    Zhang, Benny X.
    Lade, Justin A.
    Pianta, Robert M.
    Unni, Raghavan P.
    Haw, Chris S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (11) : 2530 - 2535