In silico exploratory study using structure-activity relationship models and metabolic information for prediction of mutagenicity based on the Ames test and rodent micronucleus assay

被引:7
作者
Kamath, P. [1 ]
Raitano, G. [2 ]
Fernandez, A. [1 ]
Rallo, R. [3 ]
Benfenati, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Engn Quim, E-43007 Tarragona, Spain
[2] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Lab Environm Chem & Toxicol, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Engn Informat & Matemat, E-43007 Tarragona, Spain
关键词
SAR; metabolic pathway; REACH; mutagenicity; in vitro; in vivo; TOXICOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION; CARCINOGENS; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1080/1062936X.2015.1108932
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The mutagenic potential of chemicals is a cause of growing concern, due to the possible impact on human health. In this paper we have developed a knowledge-based approach, combining information from structure-activity relationship (SAR) and metabolic triggers generated from the metabolic fate of chemicals in biological systems for prediction of mutagenicity in vitro based on the Ames test and in vivo based on the rodent micronucleus assay. In the first part of the work, a model was developed, which comprises newly generated SAR rules and a set of metabolic triggers. These SAR rules and metabolic triggers were further externally validated to predict mutagenicity in vitro, with metabolic triggers being used only to predict mutagenicity of chemicals, which were predicted unknown, by SARpy. Hence, this model has a higher accuracy than the SAR model, with an accuracy of 89% for the training set and 75% for the external validation set. Subsequently, the results of the second part of this work enlist a set of metabolic triggers for prediction of mutagenicity in vivo, based on the rodent micronucleus assay. Finally, the results of the third part enlist a list of metabolic triggers to find similarities and differences in the mutagenic response of chemicals in vitro and in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1031
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Benigni R, 2008, ANN I SUPER SANITA, V44, P48
[12]   Structural analysis and predictive value of the rodent in vivo micronucleus assay results [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia ;
Worth, Andrew .
MUTAGENESIS, 2010, 25 (04) :335-341
[13]  
Chemical Carcinogenesis Research Information System, NCRI INF IN HOM 2009
[14]   The Salmonella Mutagenicity Assay: The Stethoscope of Genetic Toxicology for the 21st Century [J].
Claxton, Larry D. ;
Umbuzeiro, Gisela de A. ;
DeMarini, David M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 118 (11) :1515-1522
[15]   DESCRIBING THE VALIDITY OF CARCINOGEN SCREENING-TESTS [J].
COOPER, JA ;
SARACCI, R ;
COLE, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1979, 39 (01) :87-89
[16]   Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy [J].
Dao, Phuong ;
Wang, Kendric ;
Collins, Colin ;
Ester, Martin ;
Lapuk, Anna ;
Sahinalp, S. Cenk .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (13) :I205-I213
[17]   The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation Database: the first decade [J].
Ellis, Lynda B. M. ;
Roe, Dave ;
Wackett, Lawrence P. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2006, 34 :D517-D521
[18]  
European Chemicals Agency, 2014, REG SUBST
[19]  
European Chemicals Agency, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment
[20]   Predictive toxicology: Benchmarking molecular descriptors and statistical methods [J].
Feng, J ;
Lurati, L ;
Ouyang, H ;
Robinson, T ;
Wang, YY ;
Yuan, SL ;
Young, SS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (05) :1463-1470