Changing Perceptions of Harm of e-Cigarette vs Cigarette Use Among Adults in 2 US National Surveys From 2012 to 2017

被引:96
作者
Huang, Jidong [1 ]
Feng, Bo [2 ,3 ]
Weaver, Scott R. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Pechacek, Terry F. [1 ]
Slovic, Paul
Eriksen, Michael P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Behav Sci, 140 Decatur St,Urban Life Bldg Ste 859, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] IMPAQ Int, Columbia, MD USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[5] Decis Res, Eugene, OR USA
[6] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
TOBACCO;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Debate is ongoing about whether the scientific evidence of the health risks of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) compared with combustible cigarettes (hereinafter referred to as cigarettes) has been accurately communicated to the public. Large representative surveys are needed to examine how the public perceives the health risk of e-cigarettes and how their perceptions change over time. OBJECTIVE To examine how US adults perceived the harm of e-cigarettes relative to cigarettes and how their perception has changed from 2012 to 2017. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Survey study using data from 2 multiyear cross-sectional nationally representative surveys-the Tobacco Products and Risk Perceptions Surveys (TPRPS) and the Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS)-to assess perceived harm of e-cigarettes relative to cigarettes among US adults in 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. Respondents were selected via address-based sampling or random-digit dialing and consisted of adults 18 years or older. Analyses were conducted from February through April 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported perceived harm of e-cigarettes relative to cigarettes. RESULTS The analytical samples of TPRPS consisted of 2800 adults in 2012 (cumulative response rate, 7.3%), 5668 in 2014 (cumulative response rate, 6.6%), 5372 in 2015 (cumulative response rate, 6.8%), 5245 in 2016 (cumulative response rate, 6.4%), and 5357 in 2017 (cumulative response rate, 5.8%). The analytical samples of HINTS consisted of 2609 adults in 2012 (response rate, 39.9%), 3301 in 2014 (response rate, 34.4%), 2224 in 2015 (response rate, 33.0%), and 2683 in 2017 (response rate, 32.4%). The proportion of adults who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes decreased from 39.4%(95% CI, 36.9%-41.9%) in 2012 to 33.9%(95% CI, 32.7%-35.2%) in 2017 in TPRPS and decreased from 50.7%(95% CI, 48.8%-52.7%) in 2012 to 34.5% (95% CI, 32.7%-36.3%) in 2017 in HINTS. During the same period, the proportion of adults who perceived e-cigarettes to be as harmful as cigarettes increased from 11.5%(95% CI, 10.0%-13.2%) in 2012 to 36.4%(95% CI, 35.1%-37.7%) in 2017 (TPRPS) and from 46.4%(95% CI, 44.5%-48.3%) in 2012 to 55.6%(95% CI, 53.7%-57.5%) in 2017 (HINTS). Those who perceived e-cigarettes to be more harmful than cigarettes increased from 1.3%(95% CI, 0.8%-2.2%) in 2012 to 4.3%(95% CI, 3.8%-4.9%) in 2017 (TPRPS) and from 2.8%(95% CI, 2.2%-3.5%) in 2012 to 9.9%(95% CI, 8.8%-11.1%) in 2017 (HINTS). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, the proportion of US adults who perceived e-cigarettes to be as harmful as or more harmful than cigarettes increased substantially from 2012 to 2017. The findings of this study underscore the urgent need to accurately communicate the risks of e-cigarettes to the public, which should clearly differentiate the absolute from the relative harms of e-cigarettes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PUBL HLTH CONS E CIG
[2]  
Brazier Y., 2018, Medical News Today
[3]   Pulmonary toxicity of e-cigarettes [J].
Chun, Lauren F. ;
Moazed, Farzad ;
Calfee, Carolyn S. ;
Matthay, Michael A. ;
Gotts, Jeffrey E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LUNG CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 313 (02) :L193-L206
[4]   How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes [J].
Czoli, Christine D. ;
Fong, Geoffrey T. ;
Mays, Darren ;
Hammond, David .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2017, 26 (E1) :E49-E58
[5]   Factors associated with dual use of tobacco and electronic cigarettes: A case control study [J].
Farsalinos, Konstantinos E. ;
Romagna, Giorgio ;
Voudris, Vassilis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2015, 26 (06) :595-600
[6]   Measuring perceptions related to e-cigarettes: Important principles and next steps to enhance study validity [J].
Gibson, Laura A. ;
Creamer, MeLisa R. ;
Breland, Alison B. ;
Giachello, Aida Luz ;
Kaufman, Annette ;
Kong, Grace ;
Pechacek, Terry F. ;
Pepper, Jessica K. ;
Soule, Eric K. ;
Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2018, 79 :219-225
[7]   E-Cigarettes: Use, Effects on Smoking, Risks, and Policy Implications [J].
Glantz, Stanton A. ;
Bareham, David W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 39, 2018, 39 :215-235
[8]  
Huang J., 2011, Tobacco Control
[9]   Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed over 13 years [J].
Hyland, A ;
Li, Q ;
Bauer, JE ;
Giovino, GA ;
Steger, C ;
Cummings, KN .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2004, 6 :363-369
[10]   Deficiencies in public understanding about tobacco harm reduction: results from a United States national survey [J].
Kiviniemi, Marc T. ;
Kozlowski, Lynn T. .
HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2015, 12