The frequency and cost of redundant laboratory testing for transferred ED patients

被引:16
作者
Rogg, Jonathan G. [1 ]
Rubin, J. Tyler [2 ]
Hansen, Paul [2 ]
Liu, Shan W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Affiliated Emergency Med Residency, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2013.03.037
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Health care costs continue to rise; reducing unnecessary laboratory testing may reduce costs. The goal of this study was to calculate the frequency and estimated costs of repeat normal laboratory testing of patients transferred to a tertiary care emergency department (ED). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients transferred to a tertiary care, level -one trauma ED with an annual census of 90,000 patients. We defined "repeat normal testing" as laboratory tests repeated within 8 hours that were normal at both the sending hospital and the receiving tertiary care hospital. We estimated the charges associated with repeat normal laboratory testing for 11 common ED tests: basic metabolic panel, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, lipase, thyroids stimulating hormone, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, complete blood count, liver function test, and urine analysis. Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients were transferred to the receiving tertiary care hospital from within the hospital's network from May 1, 2011, to October 31, 2011. On average, each transferred patient had one repeat normal laboratory test (245/232 = 1.06). For all laboratory tests, repeat normal testing occurred at least 40% of the time. Extrapolating the data, the total yearly estimated charges of all repeat normal testing was $580,526. Conclusion: This study provides the first analysis of the frequency of repeated laboratory testing for all transferred ED patients and indicates that repeat normal testing represents a significant cost. Future research needs to determine if such repeat testing is indeed clinically appropriate or redundant. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1123
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Cassidy LD, 2002, AM J MANAG CARE, V8, P787
[2]   Inefficiencies in a Rural Trauma System: The Burden of Repeat Imaging in Interfacility Transfers [J].
Gupta, Rajan ;
Greer, Sarah E. ;
Martin, Eric D. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (02) :253-255
[3]   Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine [J].
Shapiro, Jason S. ;
Kannry, Joseph ;
Lipton, Mark ;
Goldberg, Eric ;
Conocenti, Paul ;
Stuard, Susan ;
Wyatt, Brian M. ;
Kuperman, Gilad .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) :426-432
[4]  
Stair T O, 1998, J Emerg Med, V16, P895, DOI 10.1016/S0736-4679(98)00106-1
[5]   Decreasing Lab Turnaround Time Improves Emergency Department Throughput and Decreases Emergency Medical Services Diversion: A Simulation Model [J].
Storrow, Alan B. ;
Zhou, Chuan ;
Gaddis, Gary ;
Han, Jin H. ;
Miller, Karen ;
Klubert, David ;
Laidig, Andy ;
Aronsky, Dominik .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (11) :1130-1135
[6]  
STUMP IG, 1983, CAN MED ASSOC J, V128, P1185
[7]   Frequency and costs of laboratory and radiograph repetition in trauma patients undergoing interfacility transfer [J].
Thomas, SH ;
Orf, J ;
Peterson, C ;
Wedel, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (02) :156-158
[8]   Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing [J].
van Walraven, C ;
Raymond, M .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (12) :1997-2005