Predictor of Severe Gastroduodenal Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Abdominopelvic Malignancies

被引:67
作者
Bae, Sun Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Mi-Sook [1 ]
Cho, Chul Koo [1 ]
Kang, Jin-Kyu [1 ]
Lee, Sang Yeob [1 ]
Lee, Kyung-Nam [1 ]
Lee, Dong Han [4 ]
Han, Chul Ju [2 ]
Yang, Ki Young [2 ]
Kim, Sang Bum [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Radiol & Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul 139706, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Radiol & Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 139706, South Korea
[3] Korea Inst Radiol & Med Sci, Dept Gen Surg, Seoul 139706, South Korea
[4] Korea Inst Radiol & Med Sci, CyberKnife Ctr, Seoul 139706, South Korea
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2012年 / 84卷 / 04期
关键词
PHASE-I/II TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIVER METASTASES; CARCINOMA; ONCOLOGY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify the predictors for the development of severe gastroduodenal toxicity (GDT) in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using 3 fractionations for abdominopelvic malignancies. Methods and Materials: From 2001 to 2011, 202 patients with abdominopelvic malignancies were treated with curative-intent SBRT. Among these patients, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 40 patients with the eligibility criteria as follows: 3 fractionations, follow-up period >= 1 year, absence of previous radiation therapy (RT) history or combination of external-beam RT and the presence of gastroduodenum (GD) that received a dose higher than 20% of prescribed dose. The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (range, 33-60 Gy) with 3 fractions. We analyzed the clinical and dosimetric parameters, including multiple dose-volume histogram endpoints: V-20 (volume of GD that received 20 Gy), V-25, V-30, V-35, and D-max (the maximum point dose). The grade of GDT was defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.0, and GDT >= grade 3 was defined as severe GDT. Results: The median time to the development of severe GDT was 6 months (range, 3-12 months). Severe GDT was found in 6 patients (15%). D-max was the best dosimetric predictor for severe GDT. D-max of 35 Gy and 38 Gy were respectively associated with a 5% and 10% probability of the development of severe GDT. A history of ulcer before SBRT was the best clinical predictor on univariate analysis (P=.0001). Conclusions: We suggest that D-max is a valuable predictor of severe GDT after SBRT using 3 fractionations for abdominopelvic malignancies. A history of ulcer before SBRT should be carefully considered as a clinical predictor, especially in patients who receive a high dose to GD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:E469 / E474
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF SINGLE-FRACTION STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR LIVER MALIGNANCIES
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Wiegner, Ellen A.
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Mo, Qianxing
    Yang, George
    Gibbs, Iris C.
    Fisher, George A.
    Koong, Albert C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02): : 486 - 493
  • [22] Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Wahl, Daniel R.
    Stenmark, Matthew H.
    Tao, Yebin
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    Caoili, Elaine M.
    Lawrence, Theodore S.
    Schipper, Matthew J.
    Feng, Mary
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (05) : 452 - +
  • [23] Renal atrophy after stereotactic body radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Takeda, Ken
    Matsushita, Haruo
    Umezawa, Rei
    Sato, Kiyokazu
    Kubozono, Masaki
    Ito, Kengo
    Ishikawa, Yojiro
    Kozumi, Maiko
    Takahashi, Noriyoshi
    Katagiri, Yu
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    Jingu, Keiichi
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [24] Vertebral compression fracture risk after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases Clinical article
    Boehling, Nicholas S.
    Grosshans, David R.
    Allen, Pamela K.
    McAleer, Mary F.
    Burton, Allen W.
    Azeem, Syed
    Rhines, Laurence D.
    Chang, Eric L.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [25] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies: Passing fancy or here to stay?
    Hutten, Ryan J.
    Huang, Y. Jessica
    Gaffney, David K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 (03) : 642 - 644
  • [26] Commentary: Local Control and Toxicity of Multilevel Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Dunne, Emma M.
    Liu, Mitchell
    Hofstetter, Christoph
    Saigal, Rajiv
    Lo, Simon S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 (02) : E173 - E174
  • [27] Dosimetric predictors of chest wall pain after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Creach, Kimberly M.
    El Naqa, Issam
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Olsen, Jeffrey R.
    Parikh, Parag J.
    Drzymala, Robert E.
    Bloch, Charles
    Robinson, Clifford G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [28] Clinical characteristics and outcome of pneumothorax after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Asai, Kaori
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Sasaki, Tomonari
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Ohga, Saiji
    Yoshitake, Tadamasa
    Terashima, Kotaro
    Shinoto, Makoto
    Matsumoto, Keiji
    Hirata, Hidenari
    Honda, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 20 (06) : 1117 - 1121
  • [29] Local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy of centrally located lung tumours
    Khalil, A. A.
    Knap, M. M.
    Moller, D. S.
    Nyeng, T. B.
    Kjeldsen, R.
    Hoffmann, L.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (08) : 1069 - 1073
  • [30] Efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung metastases in three patients with pediatric malignancies
    Deck, Jared
    Eastwick, Gary
    Sima, Jody
    Raymond, Amanda
    Bogart, Jeffrey
    Aridgides, Paul
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 3723 - 3727