Operating Cost Coverage vs. Water Utility Complaints

被引:6
|
作者
Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Environm Engn, Business & Environm Technol Econ Lab, GR-67100 Xanthi, Greece
来源
WATER | 2018年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
customer complaints; financial performance; IBNET; open data; operating costs; DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; TREATMENT PLANTS; BENCHMARKING; PERFORMANCE; SECTOR; ECONOMIES; QUALITY; SCALE; SERVICE; SCOPE;
D O I
10.3390/w10010027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In addressing the topic of decision making in the water sector, what has been suggested to be useful up to this point is benchmarking. This paper aims at exploring the relationship between the Operating Cost Coverage Index and customer complaints about water and wastewater services for 1898 water utilities in 11 countries, i.e., Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Lithuania, Peru, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The data used are the most recent available per country through the International Benchmarking Network for Water and Sanitation Utilities (2013-2016). In order to examine the aforementioned relationship and further reveal the key policy messages that are derived by this analysis, parametric and non-parametric group comparisons are employed. The results of those comparisons concerning the two examined indicators of this study consist of two main findings: The first sheds light on the rational argument that well performing utilities open their data to others-at least more so than those not performing as well. The second is that there could be an association between financial performance and the complaints received about water and wastewater services, but this finding requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Size Matter? Operating Cost Coverage for Water Utilities
    Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis
    Water Resources Management, 2013, 27 : 1551 - 1562
  • [2] Does Size Matter? Operating Cost Coverage for Water Utilities
    Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (05) : 1551 - 1562
  • [3] Cost efficiency of Tunisian water utility districts: Does heterogeneity matter?
    Ben Amor, Tawfik
    Mellah, Thuraya
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2023, 84
  • [4] Decentralisation and Efficiency in Municipal Sports Services: Expenditure vs. Cost
    Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
    Felipe, Jose Luis
    Gallardo, Leonor
    Majano, Carlos
    Perez-Lopez, Gemma
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Subsidies vs. deposits and cost inefficiency in microfinance
    Al-Azzam, Moh'd
    Mimouni, Karim
    Smaoui, Houcem
    Temimi, Akram
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 198 : 212 - 235
  • [6] Water Exchange vs. Water Immersion During Colonoscope Insertion
    Rex, Douglas K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (09) : 1401 - 1403
  • [7] Comparing the Utility of Robust vs. Sparse Energy Storage Data Sets
    Thompson, Joe
    Willard, Steve
    Painter, Albert
    Shah, Saumil
    Etringer, Andrew
    Crawford, Alasdair
    2024 IEEE ELECTRICAL ENERGY STORAGE APPLICATION AND TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE, EESAT, 2024,
  • [8] Data utilization at finnish water and wastewater utilities: Current practices vs. state of the
    Sirkia, Jukka
    Laakso, Tuija
    Ahopelto, Suvi
    Ylijoki, Ossi
    Porras, Jari
    Vahala, Riku
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2017, 45 : 69 - 75
  • [9] Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition
    Jones, Roy
    Mendelson, Haim
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (01) : 164 - 176
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine vs. aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Ascher-Svanum, Haya
    Stensland, Michael D.
    Peng, Xiaomei
    Faries, Douglas E.
    Stauffer, Virginia L.
    Osuntokun, Olawale O.
    Kane, John M.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2011, 27 (01) : 115 - 122