The United Nations Global Compact: Engaging Implicit and Explicit CSR for Global Governance

被引:31
作者
Brown, Jill A. [1 ]
Clark, Cynthia [1 ]
Buono, Anthony F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, 175 Forest St, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
关键词
United Nations Global Compact; CSR; Global governance; Institutional logics; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; COLLECTIVE IDENTITY; COMPETING LOGICS; INDUSTRY; FIRM; PERSPECTIVE; PARADOX; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-016-3382-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyzes the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) under the conceptual framework of explicit versus implicit corporate social responsibility (CSR) to better understand the operational and governance challenges behind this voluntary global initiative. Using institutional logics theory, we show how the UNGC is a practice that embodies seemingly competing logics. We suggest mechanisms to facilitate the interplay of implicit/explicit CSR and the co-existence of logics that might allow the UNGC to move forward while addressing its critics. We argue that failure to conceptualize the UNGC as a combination of explicit and implicit CSR leaves the UNGC subject to criticism that might be better directed toward organizations that fail to practice explicit CSR. While viewing the UNGC through an integrated CSR framework may not immediately reconcile its critics and proponents, combining elements of both may provide opportunities to posit collaborative solutions to improve the quality, outcome, and legitimacy of UNGC initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 734
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
[51]   Implicit and "explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility [J].
Matten, Dirk ;
Moon, Jeremy .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 33 (02) :404-424
[52]   A Stakeholder Approach to the Ethicality of BRIC-firm Managers' Use of Favors [J].
McCarthy, Daniel J. ;
Puffer, Sheila M. ;
Dunlap, Denise R. ;
Jaeger, Alfred M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 109 (01) :27-38
[53]   Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective [J].
McWilliams, A ;
Siegel, D .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :117-127
[54]   Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications [J].
McWilliams, A ;
Siegel, DS ;
Wright, PM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (01) :1-18
[55]  
Misutka PJ, 2013, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V39, P131, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039A&B009
[56]   Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts [J].
Mitchell, RK ;
Agle, BR ;
Wood, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04) :853-886
[57]   Event Attention, Environmental Sensemaking, and Change in Institutional Logics: An Inductive Analysis of the Effects of Public Attention to Clinton's Health Care Reform Initiative [J].
Nigam, Amit ;
Ocasio, William .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (04) :823-841
[58]  
Ocasio W, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P187, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.3.CO
[59]  
2-B
[60]   Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability [J].
Orlitzky, Marc ;
Siegel, Donald S. ;
Waldman, David A. .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2011, 50 (01) :6-27