Conflict Cultures in Organizations: How Leaders Shape Conflict Cultures and Their Organizational-Level Consequences

被引:120
作者
Gelfand, Michele J. [1 ]
Leslie, Lisa M. [2 ]
Keller, Kirsten [3 ]
de Dreu, Carsten [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
culture; conflict management; norms; leadership; organizations; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; METHOD VARIANCE; TASK CONFLICT; SOCIAL MOTIVES; WORK; CLIMATE; ORIENTATION; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1037/a0029993
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Anecdotal evidence abounds that organizations have distinct conflict cultures, or socially shared norms for how conflict should be managed. However, research to date has largely focused on conflict management styles at the individual and small group level, and has yet to examine whether organizations create socially shared and normative ways to manage conflict. In a sample of leaders and members from 92 branches of a large bank, factor analysis and aggregation analyses show that 3 conflict cultures-collaborative, dominating, and avoidant-operate at the unit level of analysis. Building on Lewin, Lippitt, and White's (1939) classic work, we find that leaders' own conflict management behaviors are associated with distinct unit conflict cultures. The results also demonstrate that conflict cultures have implications for macro branch-level outcomes, including branch viability (i.e., cohesion, potency, and burnout) and branch performance (i.e., creativity and customer service). A conflict culture perspective moves beyond the individual level and provides new insight into the dynamics of conflict management in organizational contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1147
页数:17
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining [J].
Amanatullah, Emily T. ;
Morris, Michael W. ;
Curhan, Jared R. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (03) :723-738
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HP WAY B HEWLETT I B
[3]  
ARGYRIS C, 1971, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V17, pB275
[4]   Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety [J].
Barling, J ;
Loughlin, C ;
Kelloway, EK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :488-496
[5]   Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance [J].
Beersma, B ;
De Dreu, CKW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 89 (03) :358-374
[6]  
Blake RobertR., 1964, The managerial grid
[7]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[8]   What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel Discussion [J].
Brannick, Michael T. ;
Chan, David ;
Conway, James M. ;
Lance, Charles E. ;
Spector, Paul E. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 13 (03) :407-420
[9]   Management team learning orientation and business unit performance [J].
Bunderson, JS ;
Sutcliffe, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) :552-560
[10]   Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China [J].
Chen, GQ ;
Liu, CH ;
Tjosvold, D .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2005, 42 (02) :277-300