CO2 transport strategy and its cost estimation for the offshore CCS in Korea

被引:28
|
作者
Jung, Jung-Yeul [1 ]
Huh, Cheol [1 ]
Kang, Seong-Gil [1 ]
Seo, Youngkyun [2 ]
Chang, Daejun [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Ocean Sci & Technol, Offshore CCS Res Unit, MOERI, Taejon 305343, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Div Ocean Syst Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
关键词
CO2 capture and storage (CCS); Pipeline; Shipping; Infrastructure; Cost; STORAGE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.055
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Republic of Korea is the ninth largest CO2 emission country in 2009 according to the International Energy Agency (LEA). To mitigate the effect of CO2 on the climate change and global warming, Korea should reduce the anthropogenic CO2 emissions from sources such as power plants and iron works. CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS) technology is regarded as one of the most promising carbon reduction options. The demonstration project of CCS is funded by the Korean government to demonstrate the capture, transportation and storage of 1 Mt CO2 per year in Korea by 2020. This study established the CO2 transport strategies from the sources to sinks for the CCS demonstration in Korea. Also the cost estimations were carried out with the CO2 transport strategies. The CO2 transport methods suggested in this study are the pipelines for both onshore and offshore, and a ship-based concept consisting of a pipeline from the source to coastal terminal (including the liquefaction facility on a barge) and a CO2 carrier from the terminal to sink (including the temporary storage near offshore sink). Although the present study is now on-going to optimize the CO2 transport infrastructure for the offshore CCS in Korea, the preliminary results show the CO2 transport cost for the pipeline system is lower than that for the shipping in the present status. The result is meaningful only for the specific source and storage sites studied in this study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1060
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CO2 Transport Strategy for the Offshore CCS in Korea
    Jung, Jung-Yeul
    Huh, Cheol
    Kang, Seong-Gil
    Seo, Youngkyun
    Chang, Daejun
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 3242 - 3249
  • [2] Large-scale CO2 transport and storage infrastructure development and cost estimation in the Netherlands offshore
    Wildenborg, Ton
    Loeve, Daniel
    Neele, Filip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 118
  • [3] CO2 leakage environmental damage cost - A CCS project in South Korea
    Lee, Joo Suk
    Choi, Eun Chul
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 93 : 753 - 758
  • [4] A preliminary estimation for CCS storage cost of Korea
    Kim, Ji Whan
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [5] The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Yaw, Sean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 70 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Systematic Framework for CO2 Transport Design of CCS System in the Archipelagic State
    Mualim, Annasit
    Juwari
    Altway, Ali
    Renanto
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 7 (1-2) : 269 - 292
  • [7] Influence of Methane in CO2 Transport and Storage for CCS Technology
    Blanco, Sofia T.
    Rivas, Clara
    Fernandez, Javier
    Artal, Manuela
    Velasco, Inmaculada
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (23) : 13016 - 13023
  • [8] Joining the CCS club! The economics of CO2 pipeline projects
    Massol, Olivier
    Tchung-Ming, Stephane
    Banal-Estanol, Albert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 247 (01) : 259 - 275
  • [9] Evaluation of offshore CO2 transport alternatives in Brazil
    Nogueira, Tainan
    Rochedo, Pedro R. R.
    Szklo, Alexandre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 116
  • [10] Corrosion of pipelines used for CO2 transport in CCS: Is it a real problem?
    Cole, Ivan S.
    Corrigan, Penny
    Sim, Samson
    Birbilis, Nick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (04) : 749 - 756