Comparison of the Effects of Vapocoolant Spray and Topical Anesthetic Cream on Pain During Intraarticular Injection of the Shoulder: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

被引:6
作者
Moon, Young-Eun [1 ]
Kim, Sang-Hyun [2 ]
Seok, Hyun [2 ]
Lee, Seung Yeol [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med Moon, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bucheon, South Korea
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2020年 / 101卷 / 10期
关键词
Anesthetics; local; Injections; Pain perception; Rehabilitation; ETHYL CHLORIDE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.021
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was performed to compare the effects of a vapocoolant spray and a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream on reducing pain during intra-articular (IA) injection of the shoulder. Design: Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Patients (N= 63) who underwent IA injection of the shoulder joint were randomized into the spray group, EMLA group, or placebo group. Intervention: Placebo cream+vapocoolant spray (spray group), EMLA cream+placebo spray (EMLA group), or placebo cream+placebo spray (placebo group) before IA injection. Main Outcome Measures: A 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for injection pain and 5-point Likert scales for participant satisfaction and preference for repeated use were administered immediately after IA injection. Results: The VAS scores for pain during IA injection were 30.0 (95% CI, 19.7-41.2) in the spray group, 50.0 (95% CI, 37.7-63.0) in the EMLA group, and 53.8 (95% CI, 41.6-65.0) in the placebo group (F = 6.403, P<.01). The spray group showed significantly better Likert scale scores than the placebo group for participant satisfaction (P = .003) and preference for repeated use (P<.001). Conclusions: Vapocoolant spray was effective in reducing pain during IA injection of the shoulder. (C) 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1689 / 1695
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   A Clinical Comparison of EMLA Cream and Ethyl Chloride Spray Application for Pain Relief of Forehead Botulinum Toxin Injection [J].
Irkoren, Saime ;
Ozkan, Heval Selman ;
Karaca, Huray .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 75 (03) :272-274
[12]   OSTEO-ARTHRITIS OF THE GLENOHUMERAL JOINT - A RADIOLOGIC PATHOLOGIC-STUDY [J].
KERR, R ;
RESNICK, D ;
PINEDA, C ;
HAGHIGHI, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 144 (05) :967-972
[13]   PERIPHERAL NEURAL CORRELATES OF CUTANEOUS ANESTHESIA INDUCED BY SKIN COOLING IN MAN [J].
KUNESCH, E ;
SCHMIDT, R ;
NORDIN, M ;
WALLIN, U ;
HAGBARTH, KE .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 129 (02) :247-257
[14]   Determinants of success and failure of EMLA [J].
Lander, J ;
Hodgins, M ;
Nazarali, S ;
McTavish, J ;
Ouellette, J ;
Friesen, E .
PAIN, 1996, 64 (01) :89-97
[15]   Comparison of the Effects of Vapocoolant Spray and Topical Anesthetic Cream on Pain During Needle Electromyography in the Medial Gastrocnemius [J].
Moon, Young-Eun ;
Kim, Sang-Hyun ;
Choi, Won-Hyeok .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 94 (05) :919-924
[16]   Skin Sterility After Application of Ethyl Chloride Spray [J].
Polishchuk, Daniil ;
Gehrmann, Robin ;
Tan, Virak .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (02) :118-120
[17]   A COMPARISON OF PAIN MEASUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF MECHANICAL VISUAL ANALOG AND SIMPLE NUMERICAL RATING-SCALES [J].
PRICE, DD ;
BUSH, FM ;
LONG, S ;
HARKINS, SW .
PAIN, 1994, 56 (02) :217-226
[18]  
Roach K E, 1991, Arthritis Care Res, V4, P143, DOI 10.1002/art.1790040403
[19]   Ethyl chloride spray for musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided injections: An alternative to subcutaneous injection of local anesthetic solution [J].
Shah, Amit ;
Vidoni, Alessandro ;
McGarry, Sharon ;
Davies, Mark ;
James, Steven ;
Botchu, Rajesh .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2018, 46 (02) :129-131
[20]   Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update [J].
Sharma, L ;
Kapoor, D ;
Issa, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 18 (02) :147-156