The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students' symbol sense

被引:6
作者
Kop, Peter M. G. M. [1 ]
Janssen, Fred J. J. M. [1 ]
Drijvers, Paul H. M. [2 ]
van Driel, Jan H. [3 ]
机构
[1] ICLON Leiden Univ, Grad Sch Teaching, Postbox 905, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Princetonpl 5, NL-3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Graphing formulas; Qualitative reasoning; Symbol sense;
D O I
10.1007/s10649-020-09970-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Students in secondary school often struggle with symbol sense, that is, the general ability to deal with symbols and to recognize the structure of algebraic formulas. Fostering symbol sense is an educational challenge. In graphing formulas by hand, defined as graphing using recognition and reasoning without technology, many aspects of symbol sense come to play. In a previous study, we showed how graphing formulas by hand could be learned. The aim of the study we present here is to explore the relationship between students' graphing abilities and their symbol sense abilities while solving non-routine algebra tasks. A symbol sense test was administered to a group of 114 grade 12 students. The test consisted of eight graphing tasks and twelve non-routine algebra tasks, which could be solved by graphing and reasoning. Six students were asked to think aloud during the test. The findings show a strong positive correlation between the scores on the graphing tasks and the scores on the algebra tasks and the symbol sense used while solving these tasks. The thinking-aloud protocols suggest that the students who scored high on the graphing tasks used similar aspects of symbol sense in both the graphing and algebra tasks, that is, using combinations of recognizing function families and key features, and qualitative reasoning. As an implication for teaching practice, learning to graph formulas by hand might be an approach to promote students' symbol sense.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 161
页数:25
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ANN M N AM INT GROUP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TASK DESIGN MATH ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TEACHING LEARNING AL
[4]  
Arcavi A., 1994, For the Learning of Mathematics, V14, P24
[5]  
Arcavi A., 2005, For the Learning of Mathematics, V25, P42
[6]   Functions represented as linear sequential data: relationships between presentation and student responses [J].
Ayalon, Michal ;
Watson, Anne ;
Lerman, Steve .
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2015, 90 (03) :321-339
[7]  
Bredeweg B, 2003, AI MAG, V24, P35
[8]   Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study [J].
Carlson, M ;
Jacobs, S ;
Coe, E ;
Larsen, S ;
Hsu, E .
JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2002, 33 (05) :352-378
[9]  
Carlson M., 2015, International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40753-015-0013-Y
[10]  
Drijvers P., 2011, Secondary algebra education: Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown, P5