The effect of capsulorhexis size on posterior capsular opacification: One-year results of a randomized prospective trial

被引:136
作者
Hollick, EJ [1 ]
Spalton, DJ [1 ]
Meacock, WR [1 ]
机构
[1] St Thomas Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, London SE1 7EH, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00157-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Posterior capsular opacification is the most common surgically related cause of reduced vision after cataract surgery. We studied the effect of capsulorhexis size on the pattern and severity of posterior capsular opacification. METHODS: In this prospective study 75 patients underwent standardized phacoemulsification with capsulorhexis and in-the-bag placement of a 5.5-mm polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens implant. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a small capsulorhexis of 4.5 to 5 mm to lie completely on the intraocular lens optic or a large capsulorhexis of 6 to 7 mm to lie completely off the lens optic, Patients were examined at days 1, 14, 30, 90, and 180 and at year 1 with logMAR visual acuity assessment, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing, anterior chamber flare and cell measurement, and high-resolution digital retroillumination imaging of the posterior capsule. The pattern of posterior capsular opacification was determined, and the percentage area of posterior capsular opacification was calculated for each image with dedicated image analysis software, RESULTS: Large capsulorhexes were associated with significantly more wrinkling of the posterior capsule and worse posterior capsular opacification than small capsulorhexes. At 1 year the average percentage area of posterior capsular opacification was 32.7% for small capsulorhexes (95% confidence interval, 19.8 to 45.6) and 66.2% for large capsulorhexes (95% confidence interval, 57.7 to 74.6) (P = .0001). The patients with large capsulorhexes had significantly poorer visual acuities and a trend toward worse contrast sensitivities. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significantly greater wrinkling and opacification of the posterior capsule and worse visual acuity with large capsulorhexes than with small capsulorhexes, In cataract surgery with a polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens, a small capsulorhexis with the edge completely on the surface of the implant is preferable to a large capsulorhexis in reducing posterior capsular opacification. (Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128:271-279. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 279
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] TILT AND DECENTRATION OF BAG-FIXATED INTRAOCULAR LENSES - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY BETWEEN CAPSULORHEXIS AND ENVELOPE TECHNIQUES
    AKKIN, C
    OZLER, SA
    MENTES, J
    [J]. DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1994, 87 (03) : 199 - 209
  • [2] POSTERIOR CAPSULE OPACIFICATION
    APPLE, DJ
    SOLOMON, KD
    TETZ, MR
    ASSIA, EI
    HOLLAND, EY
    LEGLER, UFC
    TSAI, JC
    CASTANEDA, VE
    HOGGATT, JP
    KOSTICK, AMP
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 37 (02) : 73 - 116
  • [3] ASSIA EI, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P153
  • [4] COBO LM, 1984, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V91, P857
  • [5] CAPSULE CONTRACTION SYNDROME
    DAVISON, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 (05) : 582 - 589
  • [6] DEVELOPMENT, ADVANTAGES, AND METHODS OF THE CONTINUOUS CIRCULAR CAPSULORHEXIS TECHNIQUE
    GIMBEL, HV
    NEUHANN, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [7] PROGRESSIVE CONSTRICTION OF THE ANTERIOR CAPSULAR OPENING FOLLOWING INTACT CAPSULORHEXIS
    HANSEN, SO
    CRANDALL, AS
    OLSON, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [8] Hiles DA, 1980, AM INTRA-OCUL IMPL J, V6, P141
  • [9] The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery
    Hollick, EJ
    Spalton, DJ
    Ursell, PG
    Pande, MV
    Barman, SA
    Boyce, JF
    Tilling, K
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [10] Lens epithelial cell regression on the posterior capsule with different intraocular lens materials
    Hollick, EJ
    Spalton, DJ
    Ursell, PG
    Pande, MV
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 82 (10) : 1182 - 1188