Did the Tea Party Win the House for the Republicans in the 2010 House Elections?

被引:2
作者
Bond, Jon R. [1 ]
Fleisher, Richard [2 ]
Ilderton, Nathan A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
来源
FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS | 2012年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Tea Party; congressional elections; 2010; elections; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1515/1540-8884.1458
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We test the hypothesis that the Tea Party won the House for Republicans in 2010. We find no support for this hypothesis. Instead, we find that variables long cited in the literature on congressional elections-in particular, the incumbent's previous electoral performance, the normal party vote in the district, candidate spending, and challenger experience-best explain the results of the 2010 elections.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   INCUMBENCY, CAMPAIGN SPENDING, AND THE DECLINE OF COMPETITION IN UNITED-STATES HOUSE ELECTIONS [J].
ABRAMOWITZ, AI .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1991, 53 (01) :34-56
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RENEWING IRELAND, P19
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, New York Times.
[4]  
[Anonymous], CHRISTIAN SCI MONITO
[5]   Candidates, campaigns, or partisan conditions? Reevaluating strategic-politicians theory [J].
Basinger, Scott J. ;
Ensley, Michael J. .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2007, 32 (03) :361-394
[6]  
Berkman M, 1999, POLIT RES QUART, V52, P481, DOI 10.1177/106591299905200302
[7]   EXPLAINING CHALLENGER QUALITY IN CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS [J].
BOND, JR ;
COVINGTON, C ;
FLEISHER, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1985, 47 (02) :510-529
[8]  
Bond JR, 1997, POLIT RES QUART, V50, P281, DOI 10.1177/106591299705000202
[9]   The 2010 Elections: Why Did Political Science Forecasts Go Awry? [J].
Brady, David W. ;
Fiorina, Morris P. ;
Wilkins, Arjun S. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2011, 44 (02) :247-250
[10]  
Cook Charlie, 2006, SHORTAGE TOP TIER CH