When voters are voting, what are they doing?: Symbolic selection and the 2016 U.S. presidential election

被引:6
|
作者
Norton, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Sociol, 1291 Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
2016 presidential election; Clinton; electoral theory; political sociology; symbolic coalitions; Trump;
D O I
10.1057/s41290-017-0040-z
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The article proposes a view of voting as symbolic selection that enables commensuration among otherwise balkanized electoral theories, focusing on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. When voters select candidates, it argues, what they are doing is selecting a signifier for a coalition of symbols that the candidate has come to signify to the voter over the course of the campaign. This perspective is used to better understand why Trump won by focusing on how different aspects of the campaign redounded to the assemblage and formation of the coalitions of symbols that voters would be voting on when they were voting. The paper argues that these coalitions help explain Trump's narrow victories in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania that were so decisive in the 2016 election.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 442
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] When voters are voting, what are they doing?: Symbolic selection and the 2016 U.S. presidential election
    Matthew Norton
    American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2017, 5 : 426 - 442
  • [2] Insiders, Outsiders, and Voters in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
    Hinich, Melvin
    Shaw, Daron
    Huang, Taofang
    PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2010, 40 (02) : 264 - 285
  • [3] The Activation of Prejudice and Presidential Voting: Panel Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Election
    Daniel J. Hopkins
    Political Behavior, 2021, 43 : 663 - 686
  • [4] Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Voters in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election
    Lewis, Gregory B.
    Rogers, Marc A.
    Sherrill, Kenneth
    POLITICS & POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 655 - 677
  • [5] On expressive voting: Evidence from the 1988 U.S. presidential election
    Kamhon Kan
    C.C. Yang
    Public Choice, 2001, 108 : 295 - 312
  • [6] Contentious dialogue: University presidential response and the 2016 U.S. presidential election
    McNaughtan, Jon
    Garcia, Hugo
    Lertora, Ian
    Louis, Sarah
    Li, Xinyang
    Croffie, Alexis L.
    McNaughtan, Elisabeth D.
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 40 (06) : 533 - 549
  • [7] They See Dead People (Voting): Correcting Misperceptions about Voter Fraud in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Holman, Mirya R.
    Lay, J. Celeste
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL MARKETING, 2019, 18 (1-2) : 31 - 68
  • [8] Young Voters' Trust of Information and Media Sources: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
    Sherman, Elaine
    Schiffman, Leon G.
    Thelen, Shawn T.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL MARKETING, 2012, 11 (04) : 246 - 264
  • [9] Impact of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election on Politically Divided Relationships
    Bayne, Hannah B.
    Impellizzeri, Jonathan
    Michel, Rebecca E.
    Dietlin, Olga
    van Doorn, Katie Aafjes
    COUNSELING AND VALUES, 2020, 65 (02) : 137 - 154
  • [10] The Global Stock Market Reactions to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Diaconasu, Delia
    Mehdian, Seyed
    Stoica, Ovidiu
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):