Geometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of Class III malocclusion

被引:5
作者
Kaygisiz, Emine [1 ]
Ocakoglu, Gokhan [2 ]
Kurnaz, Merve [1 ,3 ]
Yuksel, Sema [1 ]
Tortop, Tuba [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Biskek Cd 8 Cd 82 Sk 4, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bursa Uludag Univ, Dept Biostat, Fac Med, Bursa, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Kent Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
MAXILLARY PROTRACTION; FACEMASK THERAPY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; DIMENSIONS; EXPANSION; AGENESIS; POSITION; SPACE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.028
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The pharyngeal airway is important during diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. This study aimed to compare the changes in the shape of the pharyngeal airway in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with a facemask (FM) with a removable maxillary appliance and modified tandem traction bow appliance (MTTBA). Methods: This study consisted of pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 35 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion. In the first group, 20 patients (12 males, 8 females; mean age, 10.2 years) were treated with MTTBA. The mean treatment time was 12 months. In the second group, 15 patients (10 males, 5 females; mean age, 10.3 years) were treated with FM. The mean treatment time was 11.7 months. Nineteen pharyngeal landmarks were considered from the image corresponding to the midsagittal plane and marked using tpsDig software (version 2.04; Stony Brook, NY). Pharyngeal airway shape difference between the groups was assessed by performing a Generalized Procrustes analysis. The shape deformation of the pharyngeal airway from the pre- to posttreatment periods was evaluated using the thin-plate spline method. Results: There were no differences between MTTBA and FM groups according to airway shape for pretreatment and posttreatment periods. However, there were some deformities using the enlargement of the nasopharyngeal area in the FM group and oropharyngeal area in the MTTBA group according to pretreatment periods. Conclusions: There were no differences between the groups according to the mean pharyngeal airway shapes when the posttreatment periods of the FM and MTTBA groups were examined.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 385
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Analysis of the relationship between the morphology of the palate and facial skeletal patterns in Class III malocclusion using structural equation modelling
    Ahn, Mi So
    Shin, Sang Min
    Choi, Yong-Seok
    Wu, Te-Ju
    Ko, Ching-Chang
    Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro
    Maki, Koutaro
    Kim, Yong-Il
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2019, 22 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [2] Akin M, 2015, J OROFAC ORTHOP, V76, P520, DOI 10.1007/s00056-015-0315-3
  • [3] Evidence of secular trends in a collection of historical craniofacial growth studies
    Antoun, Joseph S.
    Cameron, Claire
    Hoy, William Sew
    Herbison, Peter
    Farella, Mauro
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 37 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [4] Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance
    Atalay, Zeynep
    Tortop, Tuba
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (06) : 655 - 661
  • [5] Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects
    Baccetti, Tiziano
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Mucedero, Manuela
    Cozza, Paola
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 346 - 350
  • [6] Second premolar agenesis is associated with mandibular form: a geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular cross-sections
    Bertl, Michael H.
    Bertl, Kristina
    Wagner, Manuel
    Gahleitner, Andre
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Ulm, Christian
    Mitteroecker, Philipp
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2016, 8 (04) : 254 - 260
  • [8] Zygomatic miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthopedic correction of Class 111 malocclusion: A controlled clinical trial
    Bozkaya, Erdal
    Yuksel, Alime Sema
    Bozkaya, Suleyman
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2017, 47 (02) : 118 - 129
  • [9] Bronoosh P, 2015, OPEN DENT J, V9, P263, DOI 10.2174/1874210601509010263
  • [10] Chambi-Rocha A, 2018, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V94, P123