Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve

被引:70
作者
Albert, Christian [1 ]
Zimmermann, Thomas [2 ]
Knieling, Joerg [2 ]
von Haaren, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[2] HafenCity Univ Hamburg, D-22085 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Participatory planning; Climate change; Adaptation; Scenarios; Social learning; SCENARIOS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper uses a planning experiment to empirically investigate possible social learning outcomes of landscape and urban planning with benefits for decision-making. Building on C. Steinitz' Framework for Alternative Futures Studies, a framework for participatory scenario-based landscape planning (SLP) is developed and used in a three-month climate adaptation planning process involving up to 37 local actors in Gartow, Germany. The evaluation of social learning outcomes follows the premise of action research and employs a mixed-method approach. The research shows that SLP can successfully generate social learning outcomes among participants. Observed social learning outcomes include gains in substantive knowledge (e.g. on climate change impacts), procedural knowledge (e.g. on alternative adaptation strategies), understanding of different perspectives, as well as social and technical skills. Participants named several potential impacts of social learning outcomes on their future decision-making, including enhanced awareness, altered agendas, and better social relations. The SLP process and its results formed the basis and inducement for further collaboration of local actors and external consultants in the development of a coordinated mission statement (Leitbild) for climate change adaptation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 360
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Albert C., 2010, PROBLEMS LANDSCAPE E, V28, P33
  • [2] Alcamo J., 2008, ENV FUTURES PRACTICE, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00402-X
  • [3] Argyris C., 1978, Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective
  • [4] Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning
    Armitage, Derek
    Marschke, Melissa
    Plummer, Ryan
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01): : 86 - 98
  • [5] Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
  • [6] Bijlsma L., 1996, Climate Change 1995-Impacts, P289
  • [7] Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning
    Blanco, Hilda
    Alberti, Marina
    Forsyth, Ann
    Krizek, Kevin J.
    Rodriguez, Daniel A.
    Talen, Emily
    Ellis, Cliff
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2009, 71 : 153 - 205
  • [8] Bortz J., 2004, STAT HUMANUND SOZIAL
  • [9] Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
  • [10] Coghlan D., 2001, DOING ACTION RES YOU