SOME COMMON INDICES OF GROUP DIVERSITY: UPPER BOUNDARIES

被引:37
作者
Solanas, Antonio [1 ]
Selvam, Rejina M. [1 ]
Navarro, Jose [2 ]
Leiva, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Fac Psychol, Dept Behav Sci Methods, Inst Res Brain Cognit & Behav IR3C, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Fac Psychol, Dept Social Psychol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
关键词
MANAGEMENT TEAM HETEROGENEITY; WORK GROUP DIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY; PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY; CONFLICT; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSTRUCTS; DIFFERENCE; DISPERSION;
D O I
10.2466/01.09.21.PR0.111.6.777-796
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Workgroup diversity can be conceptualized as variety, separation, or disparity. Thus, the proper operationalization of diversity depends on how a diversity dimension has been defined. Analytically, the minimal diversity must be obtained when there are no differences on an attribute among the members of a group, however maximal diversity has a different shape for each conceptualization of diversity. Previous work on diversity indexes indicated maximum values for variety (e.g., Blau's index and Teachman's index), separation (e.g., standard deviation and mean Euclidean distance), and disparity (e.g., coefficient of variation and the Gini coefficient of concentration), although these maximum values are not valid for all group characteristics (i.e., group size and group size parity) and attribute scales (i.e., number of categories). We demonstrate analytically appropriate upper boundaries for conditional diversity determined by some specific group characteristics, avoiding the bias related to absolute diversity. This will allow applied researchers to make better interpretations regarding the relationship between group diversity and group outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 796
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Agresti Alan., 1978, Sociological Methodology, V9, P204, DOI [10.2307/270810, DOI 10.2307/270810]
[2]   MEASURES OF INEQUALITY [J].
ALLISON, PD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (06) :865-880
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ORGANIZATIONAL RESEA, DOI DOI 10.1177/109442810033005
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPANISH J PSYCHOL
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[6]   Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance [J].
Austin, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :866-878
[7]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[8]   To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams [J].
Barsade, SG ;
Ward, AJ ;
Turner, JDF ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (04) :802-836
[9]   Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Bell, Suzanne T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (03) :595-615
[10]   Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Bell, Suzanne T. ;
Villado, Anton J. ;
Lukasik, Marc A. ;
Belau, Larisa ;
Briggs, Andrea L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (03) :709-743