On Effect Size

被引:719
作者
Kelley, Ken [1 ]
Preacher, Kristopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Management, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
effect size; confidence intervals; research design; research question; reporting results; CORRECT CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; SAMPLE-SIZE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; MULTIPLE CORRELATION; PSYCHOLOGY; REGRESSION; DISTRIBUTIONS; GUIDELINES; MAGNITUDE; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0028086
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The call for researchers to report and interpret effect sizes and their corresponding confidence intervals has never been stronger. However, there is confusion in the literature on the definition of effect size, and consequently the term is used inconsistently. We propose a definition for effect size, discuss 3 facets of effect size (dimension, measure/index, and value), outline 10 corollaries that follow from our definition, and review ideal qualities of effect sizes. Our definition of effect size is general and subsumes many existing definitions of effect size. We define effect size as a quantitative reflection of the magnitude of some phenomenon that is used for the purpose of addressing a question of interest. Our definition of effect size is purposely more inclusive than the way many have defined and conceptualized effect size, and it is unique with regard to linking effect size to a question of interest. Additionally, we review some important developments in the effect size literature and discuss the importance of accompanying an effect size with an interval estimate that acknowledges the uncertainty with which the population value of the effect size has been estimated. We hope that this article will facilitate discussion and improve the practice of reporting and interpreting effect sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 152
页数:16
相关论文
共 94 条
[31]  
Cohen J., 1965, HDB CLIN PSYCHOL, P95
[32]  
Creswell JW., 2018, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, V5
[33]   A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions [J].
Cumming, G ;
Finch, S .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 61 (04) :532-574
[34]   Statistical reform in psychology - Is anything changing? [J].
Cumming, Geoff ;
Fidler, Fiona ;
Leonard, Martine ;
Kalinowski, Pavel ;
Christiansen, Ashton ;
Kleinig, Anita ;
Lo, Jessica ;
McMenamin, Natalie ;
Wilson, Sarah .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :230-232
[35]   Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement [J].
Des Jarlais, DC ;
Lyles, C ;
Crepaz, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (03) :361-366
[36]   DATA-ANALYSIS USING STEINS ESTIMATOR AND ITS GENERALIZATIONS [J].
EFRON, B ;
MORRIS, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (350) :311-319
[37]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9]
[38]  
Ellis Brian., 1966, BASIC CONCEPTS MEASU
[39]  
Ellis PD, 2010, ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EFFECT SIZES: STATISTICAL POWER, META-ANALYSIS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS, P1
[40]   Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think - Statistical reform lessons from medicine [J].
Fidler, F ;
Thomason, N ;
Cumming, G ;
Finch, S ;
Leeman, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) :119-126