Evaluation of peri-implant bone levels and soft tissue dimensions around zirconia implants-a three-year follow-up study

被引:25
作者
Kniha, K. [1 ,3 ]
Schlegel, K. A. [1 ]
Kniha, H. [2 ]
Modabber, A. [3 ]
Hoelzle, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Craniomaxillofacial Surg, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Private Dent Clin Drs Kniha & Gahlert, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Aachen, Dept Oral & Craniomaxillofacial Surg, Aachen, Germany
关键词
dental implant; ceramic; zirconium oxide; aesthetics; papilla; bone crest; PAPILLA; IMMEDIATE; CREST; HARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to measure bone levels around zirconia implants during follow-up of up to 3 years. Additionally, the effect of clinical contact point positions on the papilla deficit was evaluated. Eighty-one patients with 105 zirconia implants were examined at the 3-year follow-up. Bone levels were measured on the date of implant placement and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years thereafter. Distances between the first bone implant contact and the contact point of the crowns and between the bone level at the adjacent tooth and the contact point of the crowns were assessed. The effect of the clinical contact point position on the papilla deficit was also assessed. Significant reductions in the distances between the bone implant contact and the implant shoulder, as well as the contact point of the crowns, and between the bone level at the adjacent tooth and the contact point of the crowns, were found. A significant association was found between the papilla deficit and the height of the contact point. Implant survival was 100% and implant success was 95.4%. While zirconia implants presented little bone loss up to 1 year, significant bone apposition was observed up to 3 years. Low contact points correlated with full papillae, whereas high contact points were associated with a papilla deficit.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 498
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[2]   Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants [J].
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Chrcanovic, Bruno ;
Ostman, Per-Olov ;
Sennerby, Lars .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :41-50
[3]   Fracture Strength of Zirconia Implants after Artificial Aging [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02) :158-166
[4]   Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Wenz, Hans J. ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :32-47
[5]  
Chu SJ, 2009, INT J PERIODONT REST, V29, P385
[6]   Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long-term peri-implant bone loss [J].
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Christiaens, Veronique ;
Doornewaard, Ron ;
Jacobsson, Magnus ;
Cosyn, Jan ;
Jacquet, Wolfgang ;
Vervaeke, Stijn .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :218-227
[7]  
DI Girolamo M, 2016, Oral Implantol (Rome), V9, P1, DOI 10.11138/orl/2016.9.1.001
[8]   Effects of Platform-Switching on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Hsu, Yung-Ting ;
Lin, Guo-Hao ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) :E9-E24
[9]   TISSUE COMPATIBILITY AND STABILITY OF A NEW ZIRCONIA CERAMIC INVIVO [J].
ICHIKAWA, Y ;
AKAGAWA, Y ;
NIKAI, H ;
TSURU, H .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (02) :322-326
[10]  
Jahn M dHB., 1992, Z Zahnarztl Implantol, VVIII, P221