After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care

被引:124
作者
Almack, Kathryn [1 ]
Cox, Karen [1 ]
Moghaddam, Nima [2 ]
Pollock, Kristian [1 ]
Seymour, Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Physiotherapy, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Lincoln Univ, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
关键词
Advance care planning; Palliative care services; Preferred place of care; Qualitative research; CANCER-PATIENTS; DEATH; ASSOCIATIONS; INTERVIEW; COUPLES; PLACE; HOPE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-684X-11-15
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study explores with patients, carers and health care professionals if, when and how Advance Care Planning conversations about patients' preferences for place of care (and death) were facilitated and documented. Methods: The study adopted an exploratory case study design using qualitative interviews, across five services delivering palliative care to cancer and non-cancer patients within an urban and rural English region. The study recruited 18 cases made up of patients (N = 18; 10 men; 8 women; median age 75); nominated relatives (N = 11; 7 women; 4 men; median age 65) and healthcare professionals (N = 15) caring for the patient. Data collection included: 18 initial interviews (nine separate interviews with patients and 9 joint interviews with patients and relatives) and follow up interviews in 6 cases (involving a total of 5 patients and 5 relatives) within one year of the first interview. Five group interviews were conducted with 15 healthcare professionals; 8 of whom also participated in follow up interviews to review their involvement with patients in our study. Results: Patients demonstrated varying degrees of reticence, evasion or reluctance to initiate any conversations about end of life care preferences. Most assumed that staff would initiate such conversations, while staff were often hesitant to do so. Staff-identified barriers included the perceived risks of taking away hope and issues of timing. Staff were often guided by cues from the patient or by intuition about when to initiate these discussions. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the complexities surrounding the initiation of Advance Care Planning involving conversations about end of life care preferences with patients who are identified as having palliative care needs, in particular in relation to the risks inherent in the process of having conversations where mortality must be acknowledged. Future research is needed to examine how to develop interventions to help initiate conversations to develop person centred plans to manage the end of life.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BR MED J
[2]  
[Anonymous], SPOTL COMPL REP 2 ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], Cost-effective commissioning of end -of -life care user guide for the end -of -life economic analysis tool
[4]   Acceptability of an advance care planning interview schedule: a focus group study [J].
Barnes, Kelly ;
Jones, Louise ;
Tookman, Adrian ;
King, Michael .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 21 (01) :23-28
[5]  
Chapple Alison, 2011, BMJ Support Palliat Care, V1, P291, DOI 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000091
[6]  
Copp G., 2002, Nurs Time Res, V7, P118, DOI DOI 10.1177/136140960200700206
[7]   Is it recorded in the notes? Documentation of end-of-life care and preferred place to die discussions in the final weeks of life [J].
Cox, Karen ;
Moghaddam, Nima ;
Almack, Kathryn ;
Pollock, Kristian ;
Seymour, Jane .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2011, 10
[8]   Strategies for culturally effective end-of-life care [J].
Crawley, LM ;
Marshall, PA ;
Lo, B ;
Koenig, BA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (09) :673-679
[9]   Hope and advance care planning in patients with end stage renal disease: qualitative interview study [J].
Davison, Sara N. ;
Simpson, Christy .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574) :886-889
[10]   The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial [J].
Detering, Karen M. ;
Hancock, Andrew D. ;
Reade, Michael C. ;
Silvester, William .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :847