Mommy is only happy! Dutch mothers' realisation of speech sounds in infant-directed speech expresses emotion, not didactic intent

被引:81
作者
Benders, Titia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Ctr Language & Commun, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Language Studies, NL-6500 HD Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Infant-directed speech; Mother-child interaction; Affective/emotional communication; MATERNAL SPEECH; CROSS-LANGUAGE; COMMUNICATIVE INTENT; INTONATION CONTOURS; AGE; PERCEPTION; FEATURES; PROSODY; HEARING; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.09.001
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Exaggeration of the vowel space in infant-directed speech (IDS) is well documented for English, but not consistently replicated in other languages or for other speech-sound contrasts. A second attested, but less discussed, pattern of change in IDS is an overall rise of the formant frequencies, which may reflect an affective speaking style. The present study investigates longitudinally how Dutch mothers change their corner vowels, voiceless fricatives, and pitch when speaking to their infant at 11 and 15 months of age. In comparison to adult-directed speech (ADS), Dutch IDS has a smaller vowel space, higher second and third formant frequencies in the vowels, and a higher spectral frequency in the fricatives. The formants of the vowels and spectral frequency of the fricatives are raised more strongly for infants at 11 than at 15 months, while the pitch is more extreme in IDS to 15-month olds. These results show that enhanced positive affect is the main factor influencing Dutch mothers' realisation of speech sounds in IDS, especially to younger infants. This study provides evidence that mothers' expression of emotion in IDS can influence the realisation of speech sounds, and that the loss or gain of speech clarity may be secondary effects of affect. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 862
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Fundamental frequency of infants' and parents' utterances in longitudinal recordings [J].
Amano, S ;
Nakatani, T ;
Kondo, T .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 119 (03) :1636-1647
[2]  
Andruski J., 1999, P 14 INT C PHON SCI, P2177, DOI [10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607913, DOI 10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607913]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INTERSPEECH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[5]   Can we hear the prosody of smile? [J].
Aubergé, V ;
Cathiard, M .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2003, 40 (1-2) :87-97
[6]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[7]  
Bates D., 2012, R package version 0.999375-42
[8]  
Boersma P., 2009, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.13)
[9]   FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS OF MATERNAL SPEECH TO INFANTS OF 5 AND 13 MONTHS IN 4 CULTURES - ARGENTINA, FRANCE, JAPAN, AND THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BORNSTEIN, MH ;
TAL, J ;
RAHN, C ;
GALPERIN, CZ ;
LAMOUR, M ;
OGINO, M ;
PECHEUX, MG ;
TODA, S ;
AZUMA, H ;
TAMISLEMONDA, CS .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 28 (04) :593-603
[10]   Intelligibility of normal speech .1. Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics [J].
Bradlow, AR ;
Torretta, GM ;
Pisoni, DB .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 1996, 20 (3-4) :255-272