Comparison of bifurcation dynamics of turbulent transport models for the L-H transition

被引:2
|
作者
Weymiens, W. [1 ]
Paquay, S. [2 ]
de Blank, H. J. [1 ]
Hogeweij, G. M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] EURATOM, FOM Inst DIFFER, Dutch Inst Fundamental Energy Res, POB 1207, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Appl Phys, POB 503, Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.4871856
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
In more than three decades, a large amount of models and mechanisms have been proposed to describe a very beneficial feature of magnetically confined fusion plasmas: the L-H transition. Bifurcation theory can be used to compare these different models based on their dynamical transition structure. In this paper, we employ bifurcation theory to distinguish two fundamentally different descriptions of the interaction between turbulence levels and sheared flows. The analytic bifurcation analysis characterises the parameter space structure of the transition dynamics. Herewith, in these models three dynamically different types of transitions are characterised, sharp transitions, oscillatory transitions, and smooth transitions. One of the two models has a very robust transition structure and is therefore likely to be more accurate for such a robust phenomenon as the L-H transition. The other model needs more fine-tuning to get non-oscillatory transitions. These conclusions from the analytic bifurcation analysis are confirmed by dedicated numerical simulations, with the newly developed code Bifurcator.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONVECTIVE MOMENTUM TRANSPORT, SHOCK VISCOSITY, AND THE L-H TRANSITION IN TOKAMAKS
    SHAING, KC
    HSU, CT
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS B-PLASMA PHYSICS, 1993, 5 (08): : 2981 - 2988
  • [22] Bifurcation analysis and dimension reduction of a predator-prey model for the L-H transition
    Dam, Magnus
    Brons, Morten
    Rasmussen, Jens Juul
    Naulin, Volker
    Xu, Guosheng
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2013, 20 (10)
  • [23] A review of theories of the L-H transition
    Connor, JW
    Wilson, HR
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2000, 42 (01) : R1 - R74
  • [24] Linking the micro and macro: L-H transition dynamics and threshold physics
    Malkov, M. A.
    Diamond, P. H.
    Miki, K.
    Rice, J. E.
    Tynan, G. R.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2015, 22 (03)
  • [25] The physics of the mean and oscillating radial electric field in the L-H transition: the driving nature and turbulent transport suppression mechanism
    Kobayashi, T.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2020, 60 (09)
  • [26] DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF THE L-H TRANSITION
    ZOHM, H
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1994, 72 (02) : 222 - 225
  • [27] Comparison of turbulent transport models of L- and H-mode plasmas
    Honda, M.
    Fukuyama, A.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2006, 46 (05) : 580 - 593
  • [28] L-H transition in tokamaks and stellarators
    Shaing, K.C.
    Hsu, C.T.
    Christenson, P.J.
    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 1994, 36 (7 A)
  • [29] L-H TRANSITION IN TOKAMAKS AND STELLARATORS
    SHAING, KC
    HSU, CT
    CHRISTENSON, PJ
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1994, 36 (07) : A75 - A80
  • [30] L-H Transition under Poloidal Nonuniform Ion Heating in Turbulent Tokamak Plasma
    Shurygin, R., V
    PLASMA PHYSICS REPORTS, 2021, 47 (08) : 772 - 780