A Historical Analysis of the Taylor Curve

被引:9
作者
Olson, Eric [1 ]
Enders, Walter [2 ]
机构
[1] Pepperdine Univ, Econ Social Sci Div, Malibu, CA 90263 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Econ & Finance, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
C32; E31; E58; monetary policy; Taylor principle; Phillips curve; optimal control;
D O I
10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00532.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Taylor (1979) shows that there is a permanent trade-off between the volatilities of the output gap and inflation. Although a number of papers argue that the so-called Taylor curve is a policy menu, we use it as an efficiency locus to gauge the appropriateness of monetary policy. We examine the efficiency of U.S. monetary policy from 1875 onward by measuring the orthogonal distance between the observed volatilities of the output gap and inflation from the Taylor curve. We also identify time periods in which the variability of the U.S. economy changed by observing shifts in this efficiency frontier.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1299
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Balke N., Gordon R.J., Appendix B: Historical Data, The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change, pp. 781-850, (1986)
[2]  
Bunzel H., Enders W., The Taylor Rule and 'Opportunistic' Monetary Policy, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 42, pp. 931-949, (2010)
[3]  
Cecchetti S.G., Flores-Lagunes A., Krause S., Has Monetary Policy Become More Efficient? A Cross-Country Analysis, Economic Journal, 116, pp. 408-433, (2006)
[4]  
Chatterjee S., (2002)
[5]  
Chow G.C., Analysis and Control of Dynamic Economic Systems, (1975)
[6]  
Clarida R., Gali J., Gertler M., Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, pp. 147-180, (2000)
[7]  
Dolado J.J., Maria-Dolores R., Naveira M., Are Monetary-Policy Reaction Functions Asymmetric? The Role of Nonlinearity in the Phillips Curve, European Economic Review, 49, pp. 485-503, (2005)
[8]  
Ericsson N.R., Irons J.S., (1995)
[9]  
Estrella A., Fuhrer J.C., (1999)
[10]  
Favero C., Hendry D., Testing the Lucas Critique: A Review, Econometric Reviews, 11, pp. 265-306, (1992)