Psychometric Evaluation of the Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder

被引:76
作者
Weeks, Justin W. [1 ]
Heimberg, Richard G. [2 ]
Rodebaugh, Thomas L. [3 ]
Goldin, Philippe R. [4 ]
Gross, James J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, CETA, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Adult Anxiety Clin Temple, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
social anxiety disorder; social phobia; anxiety disorders; fear of positive evaluation; fear of evaluation; NEGATIVE-EVALUATION; FIT INDEXES; SELF-REPORT; VALIDATION; PHOBIA; RELIABILITY; VERSION; EVENTS; OTHERS;
D O I
10.1037/a0025723
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale (FPES; J. W. Weeks, R. G. Heimberg, & T. L. Rodebaugh, 2008) was designed to assess fear of positive evaluation, a proposed cognitive component of social anxiety. Although previous findings on the psychometric properties of the FPES have been highly encouraging, only 1 previous study has examined the psychometric profile of the FPES in a sample of patients with social anxiety disorder (T. A. Fergus et al., 2009). The primary purpose of the present study was to conduct a large multisite examination of the psychometric profile of the FPES among patients with a principal diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (n = 226; generalized subtype = 97.8%). Responses of nonanxious control participants (n = 42) were also examined. The factorial validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and treatment sensitivity of the FPES were strongly supported by our findings. Furthermore, an FPES cutoff score was identified for distinguishing levels of fear of positive evaluation characteristic of patients with social anxiety disorder from those characteristic of the control group. Results provide additional support for the psychometric properties of the FPES in clinical samples.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 312
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]   FIT INDEXES, LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS, CONSTRAINT CHANGES AND INCOMPLETE DATA IN STRUCTURAL MODELS [J].
BENTLER, PM .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1990, 25 (02) :163-172
[4]   Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders:: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders [J].
Brown, TA ;
Di Nardo, PA ;
Lehman, CL ;
Campbell, LA .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 110 (01) :49-58
[5]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PENN STATE WORRY QUESTIONNAIRE IN A CLINICAL ANXIETY DISORDERS SAMPLE [J].
BROWN, TA ;
ANTONY, MM ;
BARLOW, DH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1992, 30 (01) :33-37
[6]  
Clark DM., 1995, Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment, P69, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1997)5:13.0.CO
[7]  
2-6
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]   Effects of varying levels of anxiety within social situations: relationship to memory perspective and attributions in social phobia [J].
Coles, ME ;
Turk, GL ;
Heimberg, RG ;
Fresco, DM .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2001, 39 (06) :651-665
[10]  
Di Nardo P.A., 1994, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV