How do Competing Interest Groups Influence Environmental Policy? The Case of Renewable Electricity in Industrialized Democracies, 1989-2007

被引:78
作者
Cheon, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
environmental policy; interest groups; political economy; AIR-POLLUTION; TECHNOLOGY; ENERGY; INDUSTRY; GERMANY; CORRUPTION; PROTECTION; AGREEMENTS; INNOVATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9248.12006
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine the effect of competing interest groups on environmental policy. We argue that the supporters of environmental policy should be the most influential in the absence of opposition, while the opposition's importance is maximized when the supporter coalition is strong. This highlights an important asymmetry between competing interest groups: supporters are decisive in the absence of opposition, while the opposition is only relevant if the supporters are already strong. We test the argument against data on renewable electricity generation in nineteen OECD countries, 1989-2007. Heavy industries have particularly strong incentives to oppose policies that support renewables, because heavy industries' profitability depends on inexpensive electricity. We find that the supporter coalition has a positive effect on the growth of renewable electricity generation, but the positive effect diminishes with the strength of manufacturing. Moreover, heavy industry has a negative effect on the growth of renewable electricity generation and this effect increases with the strength of the supporter coalition.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 897
页数:24
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy [J].
Aidt, TS .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 69 (01) :1-16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The Theory of environmental policy, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, RELATIONSHIP CRUDE O
[4]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[5]  
AUSTENSMITH D, 1992, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V9, P229
[6]   COUNTERACTIVE LOBBYING [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D ;
WRIGHT, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 38 (01) :25-44
[7]   INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE - LOBBYING FOR AGENDAS AND VOTES [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (03) :799-833
[8]   National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? [J].
Baettig, Michele B. ;
Bernauer, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2009, 63 (02) :281-308
[9]  
Barrett S., 2003, Environment Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0470024747, 10.1002/0470024747]
[10]   A THEORY OF COMPETITION AMONG PRESSURE GROUPS FOR POLITICAL INFLUENCE [J].
BECKER, GS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (03) :371-400