Modeling Distance Decay Within Valuation Meta-Analysis

被引:46
作者
Johnston, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Besedin, Elena Y. [3 ]
Holland, Benedict M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, George Perkins Marsh Inst, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[2] Clark Univ, Dept Econ, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[3] ICF Int, 100 Cambridgepk Dr,Suite 501, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
[4] ABT Associates Inc, 55 Wheeler St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Non-market valuation; Benefit transfer; Benefits transfer; Meta-regression model; Spatial; Nonuse value; Proximity; Water quality; Willingness to pay; Q51; Q25; Q53; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; WATER-QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS; SPATIAL PREFERENCE HETEROGENEITY; BENEFIT TRANSFER; CONTINGENT VALUATION; NONMARKET VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC-BENEFITS; CORN-BELT; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-018-0218-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental benefit transfers increasingly rely on welfare estimates generated using meta-regression models (MRMs) of non-market willingness to pay (WTP). Theory and intuition suggest that these estimates should generally be sensitive to spatial dimensions. A common spatial pattern found in primary valuation studies is distance decay, in which WTP for environmental improvements diminishes as a function of distance to affected areas. Despite the potential importance of distance decay for benefit transfer accuracy, no valuation MRM in the published literature has developed an explicit mechanism to account for it. This paper outlines an approach to model the systematic effect of distance within valuation MRMs. The approach is illustrated using a meta-analysis of WTP for quality improvements in US water bodies. The metadata are drawn from stated preference studies that estimate per household WTP for water quality changes, and combine primary study information with external geospatial data. Results demonstrate statistically significant and intuitive influences of distance and other spatial factors on WTP. The resulting benefit transfers are more accurate than otherwise identical transfers that cannot account for spatial variations.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 690
页数:34
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abbasi T, 2012, WATER QUALITY INDICES, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-54304-2.00016-6
[2]   Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation [J].
Abildtrup, Jens ;
Garcia, Serge ;
Olsen, Soren Boye ;
Stenger, Anne .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 92 :67-77
[3]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[4]  
Aiken RA, 1985, THESIS
[5]  
ANDERSON GD, 1967, COAST ZONE MANAG, V91, P1
[6]   Valuation of natural resource improvements in the adirondacks [J].
Banzhaf, H. Spencer ;
Burtraw, Dallas ;
Evans, David ;
Krupnick, Alan .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2006, 82 (03) :445-464
[7]  
Banzhaf HS, 2011, PAPER PRESENTED AT T
[8]   Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe [J].
Bateman, I. J. ;
Brouwer, R. ;
Ferrini, S. ;
Schaafsma, M. ;
Barton, D. N. ;
Dubgaard, A. ;
Hasler, B. ;
Hime, S. ;
Liekens, I. ;
Navrud, S. ;
De Nocker, L. ;
Sceponaviciute, R. ;
Semeniene, D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (03) :365-387
[9]   The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Georgiou, Stavros ;
Lake, Iain .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :450-460
[10]   Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Atkinson, Giles ;
Turner, Kerry .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) :177-218