Brain oscillations and functional connectivity during overt language production

被引:37
作者
Ewald, Arne [1 ,2 ]
Aristei, Sabrina [3 ]
Nolte, Guido [4 ]
Rahman, Rasha Abdel [3 ]
机构
[1] NIRx Med Tech GmbH, D-13189 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Inst Technol, Machine Learning Lab, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept Psychol, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Neurophysiol & Pathophysiol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
overt language production; semantic interference; brain oscillations; functional connectivity; POTENTIALS PRECEDING SPEECH; TIME-COURSE; SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; CATEGORY INTERFERENCE; TEMPORAL SIGNATURES; THETA-OSCILLATIONS; LEXICAL SELECTION; EEG DATA; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00166
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the present study we investigate the communication of different large scale brain sites during an overt language production task with state of the art methods for the estimation of EEG functional connectivity. Participants performed a semantic blocking task in which objects were named in semantically homogeneous blocks of trials consisting of members of a semantic category (e.g., all objects are tools) or in heterogeneous blocks, consisting of unrelated objects. The classic pattern of slower naming times in the homogeneous relative to heterogeneous blocks is assumed to reflect the duration of lexical selection. For the collected data in the homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions the imaginary part of coherency (ImC) was evaluated at different frequencies. The ImC is a measure for detecting the coupling of different brain sites acting on sensor level. Most importantly, the ImC is robust to the artifact of volume conduction. We analyzed the ImC at all pairs of 56 EEG channels across all frequencies. Contrasting the two experimental conditions we found pronounced differences in the theta band at 7 Hz and estimated the most dominant underlying brain sources via a minimum norm inverse solution based on the ImC. As a result of the source localization, we observed connectivity between occipito-temporal and frontal areas, which are well-known to play a major role in lexical-semantic language processes. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of investigating interactive brain activity during overt language production.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Does the cerebellum contribute to cognitive aspects of speech production? A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in humans [J].
Ackermann, H ;
Wildgruber, D ;
Daum, I ;
Grodd, W .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1998, 247 (2-3) :187-190
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MATH GAZ, DOI DOI 10.2307/3619120
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, RANDOM DATA ANAL MEA
[4]   Electrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production [J].
Aristei, Sabrina ;
Melinger, Alissa ;
Abdel Rahman, Rasha .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (07) :1567-1586
[5]   Transitions in neural oscillations reflect prediction errors generated in audiovisual speech [J].
Arnal, Luc H. ;
Wyart, Valentin ;
Giraud, Anne-Lise .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (06) :797-U164
[6]   Electromagnetic brain mapping [J].
Baillet, S ;
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2001, 18 (06) :14-30
[7]   I see what you mean: Theta power increases are involved in the retrieval of lexical semantic information [J].
Bastiaansen, Marcel C. M. ;
Oostenveld, Robert ;
Jensen, Ole ;
Hagoort, Peter .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 106 (01) :15-28
[8]   Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing [J].
Bastiaansen, MCM ;
van der Linden, M ;
ter Keurs, M ;
Dijkstra, T ;
Hagoort, P .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 17 (03) :530-541
[9]   Event-related alpha and theta responses in a visuo-spatial working memory task [J].
Bastiaansen, MCM ;
Posthuma, D ;
Groot, PFC ;
de Geus, EJC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (12) :1882-1893
[10]   Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm [J].
Belke, E ;
Meyer, AS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (04) :667-692