Effect of ivacaftor treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D-CFTR mutation: patient-reported outcomes in the STRIVE randomized, controlled trial

被引:29
|
作者
Quittner, Alexandra [1 ]
Suthoff, Ellison [2 ]
Rendas-Baum, Regina [3 ]
Bayliss, Martha S. [3 ]
Sermet-Gaudelus, Isabelle [4 ]
Castiglione, Brenda [2 ]
Vera-Llonch, Montserrat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] Vertex Pharmaceut Inc, Boston, MA 02210 USA
[3] Optum, Lincoln, RI 02854 USA
[4] Univ Paris 04, Hop Necker Enfants Malad, F-75015 Paris, France
来源
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES | 2015年 / 13卷
关键词
Cystic fibrosis; Ivacaftor; Patient-reported outcomes; CFQ-R; Health-related quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INHALED AZTREONAM LYSINE; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; AIRWAY PSEUDOMONAS; QUESTIONNAIRE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; POTENTIATOR;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-015-0293-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited, rare autosomal recessive disease that results in chronically debilitating morbidities and high premature mortality. We evaluated how ivacaftor treatment affected CF symptoms, functioning, and well-being, as measured by the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), a widely-used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure. Methods: STRIVE, a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, evaluated ivacaftor (150 mg) in CF patients aged 12+ with the G551D-CFTR mutation for 48 weeks. Treatment effect analysis used a mixed-effects repeated measures model. Treatment benefit analyses applied the cumulative distribution function and a categorical analysis of change scores ("improvement," "no change," or "decline"). Content-based interpretation examined treatment effect on specific item responses. Results: Data from 152 patients with a baseline CFQ-R assessment were analyzed. The treatment effect analysis favored treatment with ivacaftor over placebo on the Body Image, Eating, Health Perceptions, Physical Functioning, Respiratory, Social Functioning, Treatment Burden, and Vitality scales. Findings were supported by the analysis of categorical change. On all CFQ-R scales, the percentage of patients who improved was greater for ivacaftor. In the content-based analysis, the treatment benefit was characterized by better scores across a broad range of domains. Conclusions: Results illustrate broad benefits of ivacaftor treatment across many domains: respiratory symptoms, physical and social functioning, health perceptions, and vitality, as measured by the CFQ-R. The breadth of improvements reflects the systemic mechanism of action of ivacaftor compared to other therapies. Findings support the patient-reported value of ivacaftor treatment in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据