SENSITIVITY AND VARIABILITY OF TWO PLANT WATER STRESS INDICATORS: EXPLORING CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING A PLANT MONITORING METHOD FOR AVOCADO IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT

被引:12
作者
Celedon, Jose M. [2 ]
Gil, Pilar M. [3 ]
Ferreyra, Raul [1 ]
Maldonado, Patricio [1 ]
Barrera, Cristian [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Agropecuarias INIA, La Cruz, Chile
[2] Univ British Columbia, Michael Smith Labs, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Agron & Ingn Forestal, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Dendrometers; stem water potential; environmental stress; Persea americana; STEM DIAMETER; DISCRETE PLANT; TREES; VALIDATION; PRESSURE; DEFICITS; GROWTH; ABA;
D O I
10.4067/S0718-58392012000300012
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) is a fruit-tree species highly susceptible to water deficit, which makes irrigation management a difficult task for growers. When irrigation is inadequate, trees suffer growth reduction, fruit losses, and roots damage. This study addressed the question of how to assess water stress in avocado trees and the considerations to choose an indicator to measure the plant water stress. In this work the sensitivity and variability of two water stress indicators in response to water deficit were analyzed: stem water potential (SWP) and maximum daily trunk shrinkage (MDTS). During a period of high water demand, avocado trees planted in a clay loam soil were subjected to water stress by withholding irrigation and compared to control trees irrigated according to the maximal crop evapotranspiration. During the study, avocado trees reached a minimum SWP of -0.9 MPa and a maximum MDTS of similar to 285 mu m. To better understand avocado tree response to water deficit, leaf abscisic acid, stomatal conductance, soil moisture, and vapor pressure deficit were also measured. Interestingly, it was found that water stress indicators showed differences with control after 3 d of withholding irrigation. It was possible to observe that MDTS was more sensitive in detecting water stress than SWP, signal strength of 4.5 vs. 1.2 respectively; however, MDTS higher variability counteracted its performance as stress indicator, coefficient of variation of 32% vs. 9%, respectively. This study confirms that monitoring water stress is an important tool for avocado irrigation management and should consider both, the sensitivity and variability of the indicator.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 387
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Bower J. P., 1978, Research Report, South African Avocado Growers' Association, V2, P59
[2]  
Bower John P., 1988, Horticultural Reviews, V10, P229, DOI 10.1002/9781118060834.ch7
[3]   Water stress affects leaf anatomy, gas exchange, water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars [J].
Chartzoulakis, K ;
Patakas, A ;
Kofidis, G ;
Bosabalidis, A ;
Nastou, A .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2002, 95 (1-2) :39-50
[4]   A new validation of the Scholander pressure chamber technique based on stem diameter variations [J].
Cochard, H ;
Forestier, S ;
Améglio, T .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2001, 52 (359) :1361-1365
[5]   Assessment of peach tree responses to irrigation water deficits by continuous monitoring of trunk diameter changes [J].
Cohen, M ;
Goldhamer, DA ;
Fereres, E ;
Girona, J ;
Mata, M .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 76 (01) :55-60
[6]  
Faber B., 1994, California Avocado Society Yearbook, V78, P143
[7]   Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees [J].
Fereres, E ;
Goldhamer, DA .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 78 (02) :139-144
[8]  
Gardiazabal F., 2003, P 5 WORLD AV C, P329
[9]   A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants [J].
Génard, M ;
Fishman, S ;
Vercambre, G ;
Huguet, JG ;
Bussi, C ;
Besset, J ;
Habib, R .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 126 (01) :188-202
[10]  
Gil P.M., 2008, THESIS PONTIFICIA U