Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making

被引:61
作者
Li, Cong-Cong [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez, Rosa M. [2 ]
Martinez, Luis [3 ]
Dong, Yucheng [1 ]
Herrera, Francisco [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen 23071, Spain
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Consensus; consistency; group decision making (GDM); optimization; preference relations; FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS; MODEL; AGGREGATION; SCALE; OPERATORS; HIERARCHY; EXPERTS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2856125
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The individual consistency and the consensus degree are two basic measures to conduct group decision making with reciprocal preference relations. The existing frameworks to manage individual consistency and consensus degree have been investigated intensively and follow a common resolution scheme composed by the two phases: the consistency improving process, and the consensus reaching process. But in these frameworks, the individual consistency will often be destroyed in the consensus reaching process, leading to repeat the consistency improving process, which is time consuming. In order to avoid repeating the consistency improving process, a consensus reaching process with individual consistency control is proposed in this paper. This novel consensus approach is based on the design of an optimization-based consensus rule, which can be used to determine the adjustment range of each preference value guaranteeing the individual consistency across the process. Finally, theoretical and numerical analysis are both used to justify the validity of our proposal.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 332
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aczel J., 1984, AEQUATIONES MATH, V27, P288
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WIL INT S D
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support
[4]   The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: A survey [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Zhang, Hengjie ;
Dong, Yucheng .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2015, 24 :72-83
[5]   Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. ;
Alonso, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :383-399
[6]   A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using OWA operators [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Martínez, L .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 137 (01) :71-83
[7]   Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 122 (02) :277-291
[8]   Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model [J].
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Mata, Francisco ;
Martinez, Luis ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Alonso, Sergio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 (01) :35-53
[9]   A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chu, Junfeng ;
Liu, Xinwang ;
Wang, Yingming ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 101 :227-242
[10]   Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations [J].
De Baets, B ;
De Meyer, H ;
De Schuymer, B ;
Jenei, S .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2006, 26 (02) :217-238