Potential and Foetal Value

被引:9
作者
Burgess, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch English Literatures & Philosophy, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00482.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The argument from potential has been hard to assess because the versions presented by friends and those presented by enemies have born very little resemblance to each other. I here try to improve this situation by attempting to bring both versions into enforced contact. To this end, I sketch a more detailed analysis of the modern concept of potential than any hitherto attempted. As one would expect, arguments from potential couched in terms of that notion are evident non-starters. I then ask how the modern notion of potential needs to be supplemented in order to produce a more convincing argument. I then enquire whether the supplementations utilised in the most distinguished recent presentations of the argument have anything better than an ad hoc role to play in contemporary metaphysics. I conclude that the rehabilitation of the argument is unlikely; in any event, the onus of proof seems to be on the friend of that argument to show that it is uncontrived. Finally, I argue that the (modern) notion of potential has an important role to play in any plausible account of foetal value.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Buckle S., 1990, EMBRYO EXPT
[2]  
Dancy Jonathan., 1991, COMPANION ETHICS, P411
[3]  
Lewontin Richard, 2000, TRIPLE HELIX
[4]  
Lloyd Geoffrey E. R., 1992, CONCEPT NATURE HERBE, p[10, 16]
[5]   ABORTION AND EMBODIMENT [J].
MACKENZIE, C .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1992, 70 (02) :136-155
[6]   The argument from potential: A reappraisal [J].
Reichlin, M .
BIOETHICS, 1997, 11 (01) :1-23
[7]  
Sober Elliott, 1994, BIOL POINT VIEW
[8]  
STONE J, 1987, CAN J PHILOS, V17, P815
[9]  
Stone Jim, 1994, CANADIAN J PHILOS, V24, p[281, 291]
[10]  
Tooley Michael., 1983, Abortion and Infanticide