Education, market rigidities and growth

被引：28

作者：

Aghion, Philippe ^{[1
]}

Askenazy, Philippe ^{[2
,3
]}

Bourles, Renaud ^{[4
]}

Cette, Gilbert ^{[5
,6
]}

Dromel, Nicolas

机构：

[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

[2] Paris Sch Econ, F-75014 Paris, France

[3] IZA, D-53113 Bonn, Germany

[4] Univ Mediterranee, Ctr Vielle Charite, GREQAM, F-13236 Marseille 02, France

[5] Banque France DEMS, F-75001 Paris, France

[6] Univ Mediterranee, DEFI, F-13621 Aix En Provence, France

来源：

ECONOMICS LETTERS | 2009年 / 102卷 / 01期

关键词：

Productivity; Growth; Regulations; Market Rigidities; Education; PROTECTION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.econlet.2008.11.025

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The paper exploits macro-panel data for OECD countries. Close to the technological frontier, the education level, product market rigidities and employment protection legislation would be significantly related to TFP growth, with a substantial contribution of the interaction between market rigidities. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：62 / 65

页数：4

共 16 条

[1] AGHION P, 2007, 0705 CEPREMAP
[2] Joseph Schumpeter Lecture - Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework
Aghion, Philippe
Howitt, Peter
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (2-3) : 269 - 314
[3] Aghion Philippe., 2005, COMPETITION GROWTH R
[4] BABETSKII L, 2007, CEPR DISCUSSION PAPE, V6215
[5] BASSANINI A, 2007, EC PERSPECTIVES INNO
[6] Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets
Blanchard, O
Giavazzi, F
[J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (03) : 879 - 907
[7] BOURLES R, 2006, OECD EC STUDIES, V41, P96
[8] Trends in "structural" productivity levels in the major industrialized countries
Bourles, Renaud
Cette, Gilbert
[J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2007, 95 (01) : 151 - 156
[9] Growth and human capital: good data, good results
Cohen, Daniel
Soto, Marcelo
[J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2007, 12 (01) : 51 - 76
[10] Regulation and productivity performance
Crafts, Nlcholas
[J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2006, 22 (02) : 186 - 202

← 1 2 →