How Hard is Artificial Intelligence? Evolutionary Arguments and Selection Effects

被引:0
|
作者
Shulman, Carl
Bostrom, Nick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Martin Sch, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Future Humanity Inst, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Programme Impacts Future Technol, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
DOOMSDAY ARGUMENT; OCTOPUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Several authors have made the argument that because blind evolutionary processes produced human intelligence on Earth, it should be feasible for clever human engineers to create human-level artificial intelligence in the not-too-distant future. This evolutionary argument, however, has ignored the observation selection effect that guarantees that observers will see intelligent life having arisen on their planet no matter how hard it is for intelligent life to evolve on any given Earth-like planet. We explore how the evolutionary argument might be salvaged from this objection, using a variety of considerations from observation selection theory and analysis of specific timing features and instances of convergent evolution in the terrestrial evolutionary record. We find that, depending on the resolution of disputed questions in observation selection theory, the objection can either be wholly or moderately defused, although other challenges for the evolutionary argument remain.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 130
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVOLUTIONARY AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE HERITABILITY OF INTELLIGENCE
    REED, TE
    CAHIERS DE PSYCHOLOGIE COGNITIVE-CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY OF COGNITION, 1990, 10 (06): : 659 - 667
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence: Arguments for Catastrophic Risk
    Bales, Adam
    D'Alessandro, William
    Kirk-Giannini, Cameron Domenico
    PHILOSOPHY COMPASS, 2024, 19 (02)
  • [3] Embryo selection with artificial intelligence: how to evaluate and compare methods?
    Mikkel Fly Kragh
    Henrik Karstoft
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 1675 - 1689
  • [4] Embryo selection with artificial intelligence: how to evaluate and compare methods?
    Kragh, Mikkel Fly
    Karstoft, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (07) : 1675 - 1689
  • [5] Hard choices in artificial intelligence
    Dobbe, Roel
    Gilbert, Thomas Krendl
    Mintz, Yonatan
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 300 (300)
  • [6] Hard Choices and Hard Limits for Artificial Intelligence
    Goodman, Bryce
    AIES '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, 2021, : 112 - 120
  • [7] HOW ARTIFICIAL IS INTELLIGENCE
    BENNETT, WR
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 1977, 65 (06) : 694 - 702
  • [8] Evolutionary debunking arguments and the explanatory scope of natural selection
    Joeri Witteveen
    Synthese, 2021, 198 : 6009 - 6024
  • [9] Evolutionary debunking arguments and the explanatory scope of natural selection
    Witteveen, Joeri
    SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (07) : 6009 - 6024
  • [10] The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem
    Jacobides, Michael G.
    Brusoni, Stefano
    Candelon, Francois
    STRATEGY SCIENCE, 2021, 6 (04) : 412 - 435