Immediate Postoperative Oral Nutrition Following Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

被引:71
作者
Weijs, Teus J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Berkelmans, Gijs H. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dolmans, Annemarie C. P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kouwenhoven, Ewout A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rosman, Camiel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ruurda, Jelle P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Workum, Frans [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Det, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Silva Corten, Luis C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Hillegersberg, Richard [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Luyer, Misha D. P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] ZGT Hosp, Dept Surg, Almelo, Netherlands
[3] CanisiusWilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
EARLY ENTERAL NUTRITION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; FEEDING JEJUNOSTOMY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.067
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Immediate start of oral intake is beneficial following colorectal surgery. However, following esophagectomy the safety and feasibility of immediate oral intake is unclear, thus these patients are still kept nil by mouth. This study therefore aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of oral nutrition immediately after esophagectomy. Methods. A multicenter, prospective trial was conducted in 3 referral centers between August 2013 and May 2014, including 50 patients undergoing a minimally invasive esophagectomy. Oral nutrition was started postoperatively immediately (clear liquids on postoperative day [POD] 0, liquid nutrition on POD 1 to 6, solid food from POD 7). Nonoral enteral nutrition was started when <50% of caloric need was met on postoperative day POD 5 or when oral intake was impossible. A comparison was made with a retrospective cohort (n = 50) with a per-protocol delayed start of oral intake until POD 4 to 7. Results. The median caloric intake at POD 5 was 58% of required. In 38% of the patients nonoral nutrition was started, mainly due to complications (36%). The pneumonia rate was 28% following immediate oral intake and 40% following delayed oral intake (p = 0.202). The aspiration pneumonia rate was 4% in both groups. The anastomotic leakage rate was 14% after immediate oral intake versus 24% following delayed oral intake (p = 0.202). The 90-day mortality rate was 2% in both groups. Hospital stay and intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter following immediate oral intake. Conclusions. Immediate start of oral nutrition following esophagectomy seems to be feasible and does not increase complications compared to a retrospective cohort and literature. However, if complications arise an alternative nutritional route is required. This explorative study shows that a randomized controlled trial is needed. (C) 2016 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1148
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OES CARC LAND RICHT
[2]   The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review [J].
Arya, S. ;
Markar, S. R. ;
Karthikesalingam, A. ;
Hanna, G. B. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2015, 28 (04) :326-335
[3]   Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy [J].
Atkins, BZ ;
Shah, AS ;
Hutcheson, KA ;
Mangum, JH ;
Pappas, TN ;
Harpole, DH ;
D'Amico, TA .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (04) :1170-1176
[4]   Nutritional Considerations After Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy for Malignancy [J].
Baker, Amelia ;
Wooten, Leigh-Anne ;
Malloy, Michele .
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) :85-95
[5]   Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
van der Peet, Donald L. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892
[6]   Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy A Systematic Review [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Strong, Sean ;
McNair, Angus G. K. ;
Brookes, Sara T. ;
Crosby, Tom ;
Griffin, S. Michael ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (04) :658-666
[7]   Reduction of Postoperative Ileus by Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Major Rectal Surgery Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Boelens, Petra G. ;
Heesakkers, Fanny F. B. M. ;
Luyer, Misha D. P. ;
van Barneveld, Kevin W. Y. ;
de Hingh, Ignace H. J. T. ;
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P. ;
Roos, Arnout N. ;
Rutten, Harm J. T. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (04) :649-655
[8]   Planned Delay of Oral Intake After Esophagectomy Reduces the Cervical Anastomotic Leak Rate and Hospital Length of Stay [J].
Bolton, John S. ;
Conway, William C. ;
Abbas, Abbas E. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (02) :304-309
[9]   The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery - A prospective, randomized trial [J].
Carli, F ;
Trudel, JL ;
Belliveau, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (08) :1083-1089
[10]   Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Bass, CS ;
Alexander, JR ;
Bartolucci, AA .
CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) :1187-1194