Russia's Quest for the "Historical Jesus": Tolstoy and Dostoevsky vs Strauss

被引:1
作者
Orekhanov, Georgy [1 ]
Andreev, Iereus Alexey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Tikhons Orthodox Univ Humanities, Moscow, Russia
[2] Orthodox Svyato Tikhonov Humanitarian Univ, Dept Biblical Studies, Likhov Lane 6, Moscow 127051, Russia
来源
SLOVENE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SLAVIC STUDIES | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Liberal theology; historical Jesus; David Friedrich Strauss; Ernest Renan; Leo Tolstoy; Fyodor Dostoevsky; The Idiot;
D O I
10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.1.9
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The works of theologian David Friedrich Strauss are significant milestones in the development of an academic project known as the "Quest for the Historical Jesus". As part of the Quest, various researchers tried to reconstruct the life, teachings, and personality of Jesus of Nazareth using historical and philological methods, that is, operating from the standpoint of strict positivism. The purpose of this article is to show that the works of Strauss had a significant impact on the logic and evolution of the religious quests of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky. Tolstoy became acquainted with Strauss's ideas around the late 1870s, in a period of intensive intellectual search, which eventually led him to an acute religious crisis and rejection of the official church view on Christianity. The article shows that the writer was ultimately compelled to reject the ideas of Strauss and Renan. At the same time, some elements of Strauss's theory were so close to Tolstoy that these ideas had a definite influence on his basic religious conception. Dostoevsky had the opportunity to become acquainted with the ideas of Strauss in the Petrashevsky Circle. This experience led to a deep life crisis on Dostoevsky's part, too. On the one hand, the writer had a negative view of ideas associated with the works of Strauss and Renan. On the other hand, all of Dostoevsky's artistic work is directly related to his overcoming the influence of the "Strauss-Renan narrative", which itself is evidence of the evolution of the writer's views on faith and religion.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 291
页数:31
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Андреев Алексей Васильевич Andreev A.], 2016, [Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 1: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение, St Tikhon’s University Review. Series Theology. Philosophy. Religious studies], P9, DOI 10.15382/sturI201668.9-25
[2]  
Arsentieva N. A., 2005, DOSTOEVSKII MAT ISSL, V17, P367
[3]  
Bocharov Sergei., 2001, ROMAN FM DOSTOEVSKOG, P111
[4]  
Bryner E., 2014, TOLSTOJ THEOLOGISCHE, P541
[5]  
Debu I. M., 2007, DOSTOEVSKII MIROVAIA, V22, P304
[6]  
Donskov A. A., 2003, LN TOLSTOI NN STRAKH, P1
[7]  
Dunn J., 2001, MIR BIBLII ALMANAH B, V8, P18
[8]  
Fudel S. I., 2005, SOBRANIE SOCHINENII, V3
[9]  
Golosovker J. E., 1963, DOSTOEVSKII KANT RAZ
[10]  
Hamilton William., 1993, A Quest for the Post-Historical Jesus